AI Wakening: Modernity and the Rise of an Artificial World

Modern logic and philosophy of science unsettle long-standing ontological privileges by re-centering analysis on operation, regulation, and organization rather than imitation or ends. This article asks how that modern turn enables a positive ontology of technical objects without importing life or mind as prior norms. Methodologically it offers a historical-conceptual reconstruction paired with a mechanism-level illustration (we take the example of the automatic telephone switching) to specify what “operational autonomy” entails. The argument shows how technical objects can be treated as norm-bearing and historically individuating through their functioning, while also identifying limits (Eurocentric corpus, risks of analogical transfer) and a forward program toward individuation, associated milieus, concretization, and ensemble/network levels. The contribution is to clarify the conceptual operators needed to exit instrumentality and to prepare the ontological grounding developed in the next paper.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16938756
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI Wakening: Modernity and the Rise of an Artificial World

1 citations
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
2.48
article

AI Wakening: Modernity and the Rise of an Artificial World

article en
1 citations

Abstract

Modern logic and philosophy of science unsettle long-standing ontological privileges by re-centering analysis on operation, regulation, and organization rather than imitation or ends. This article asks how that modern turn enables a positive ontology of technical objects without importing life or mind as prior norms. Methodologically it offers a historical-conceptual reconstruction paired with a mechanism-level illustration (we take the example of the automatic telephone switching) to specify what “operational autonomy” entails. The argument shows how technical objects can be treated as norm-bearing and historically individuating through their functioning, while also identifying limits (Eurocentric corpus, risks of analogical transfer) and a forward program toward individuation, associated milieus, concretization, and ensemble/network levels. The contribution is to clarify the conceptual operators needed to exit instrumentality and to prepare the ontological grounding developed in the next paper.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers (FR), Greenely (Sweden) (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.