Lower Secondary Students’ Well-Being Profiles: Stability, Transitions, and Connections with Teacher–Student, and Student–Student Relationships

Background: Classroom relationships are known to be one of the most important yet complex predictors of student well-being. However, this complexity is frequently not considered, and it remains unclear whether students with different well-being profiles and their transitions are impacted differently by teacher-student and student–student relationships. Objective: This study aims to examine secondary school students’ well-being profiles, their transitions over time, and their connection to teacher-student and student–student relationships. Methods: Participants included 757 Swiss secondary school students from grade 7 (47.8% female; Mage = 13.12, SDage =.60) to grade 8 (44.6% female; Mage = 13.92, SDage =.81). Latent profile analysis was conducted to classify students based on a multidimensional construct of student well-being, encompassing positive and negative emotions and cognitions toward school. To examine profile stability and transitions over time, latent transition analysis was used, and relationships with teacher-student closeness and conflict as well as student–student cohesion were analyzed. Results: Four well-being profiles emerged: flourishing, perfectionist, worried, and ambivalent. Profiles varied in the composition of well-being dimensions, with school worries prevalent across all profiles. Students with high positive emotions transitioned to profiles with lower well-being, while those with high negative emotions remained in less favorable profiles. Teacher-student closeness and student–student cohesion supported favorable transitions, whereas teacher-student conflict hindered positive changes. Conclusions: The identification of four distinct well-being profiles highlights individual differences in well-being and the interplay of positive and negative emotions. Teachers may play a pivotal role in preventing transitions to less favorable profiles, emphasizing the importance of fostering supportive classroom relationships.

Publication Details

Journal
Open Access Repository Bern University of Teacher Education
Published
2025-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.57694/7821
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lower Secondary Students’ Well-Being Profiles: Stability, Transitions, and Connections with Teacher–Student, and Student–Student Relationships

Open Access Repository Bern University of Teacher Education
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

Lower Secondary Students’ Well-Being Profiles: Stability, Transitions, and Connections with Teacher–Student, and Student–Student Relationships

article en

Abstract

Background: Classroom relationships are known to be one of the most important yet complex predictors of student well-being. However, this complexity is frequently not considered, and it remains unclear whether students with different well-being profiles and their transitions are impacted differently by teacher-student and student–student relationships. Objective: This study aims to examine secondary school students’ well-being profiles, their transitions over time, and their connection to teacher-student and student–student relationships. Methods: Participants included 757 Swiss secondary school students from grade 7 (47.8% female; Mage = 13.12, SDage =.60) to grade 8 (44.6% female; Mage = 13.92, SDage =.81). Latent profile analysis was conducted to classify students based on a multidimensional construct of student well-being, encompassing positive and negative emotions and cognitions toward school. To examine profile stability and transitions over time, latent transition analysis was used, and relationships with teacher-student closeness and conflict as well as student–student cohesion were analyzed. Results: Four well-being profiles emerged: flourishing, perfectionist, worried, and ambivalent. Profiles varied in the composition of well-being dimensions, with school worries prevalent across all profiles. Students with high positive emotions transitioned to profiles with lower well-being, while those with high negative emotions remained in less favorable profiles. Teacher-student closeness and student–student cohesion supported favorable transitions, whereas teacher-student conflict hindered positive changes. Conclusions: The identification of four distinct well-being profiles highlights individual differences in well-being and the interplay of positive and negative emotions. Teachers may play a pivotal role in preventing transitions to less favorable profiles, emphasizing the importance of fostering supportive classroom relationships.

Open Access Repository Bern University of Teacher Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.