PROTECTION OF MINORITY POLITICAL RIGHTS IN INDONESIAN PRESIDENTIAL DEMOCRACY THROUGH CONSTITUTIONAL OPPOSITION

Abstract The opposition is an essential element in constitutional democracy, functioning to maintain the balance of power (checks and balances), protecting the political rights of minorities, and strengthening government accountability. In Indonesia, the constitution and laws and regulations do not explicitly regulate the existence and position of the opposition, thus creating an asymmetry of power between the executive and legislative branches. This study uses a juridical-normative method with a legislative, conceptual, and comparative legal approach to the institutional practices of the opposition in India, Germany, and South Africa. The research findings indicate that formal recognition of the opposition contributes significantly to the effectiveness of the legislative oversight function and the strengthening of substantive democracy. Based on normative and comparative analysis, this article recommends a limited amendment to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia or the establishment of a special law that regulates the definition, rights, and obligations of the opposition within the framework of the Indonesian presidential system.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16941519
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PROTECTION OF MINORITY POLITICAL RIGHTS IN INDONESIAN PRESIDENTIAL DEMOCRACY THROUGH CONSTITUTIONAL OPPOSITION

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

PROTECTION OF MINORITY POLITICAL RIGHTS IN INDONESIAN PRESIDENTIAL DEMOCRACY THROUGH CONSTITUTIONAL OPPOSITION

article en

Abstract

Abstract The opposition is an essential element in constitutional democracy, functioning to maintain the balance of power (checks and balances), protecting the political rights of minorities, and strengthening government accountability. In Indonesia, the constitution and laws and regulations do not explicitly regulate the existence and position of the opposition, thus creating an asymmetry of power between the executive and legislative branches. This study uses a juridical-normative method with a legislative, conceptual, and comparative legal approach to the institutional practices of the opposition in India, Germany, and South Africa. The research findings indicate that formal recognition of the opposition contributes significantly to the effectiveness of the legislative oversight function and the strengthening of substantive democracy. Based on normative and comparative analysis, this article recommends a limited amendment to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia or the establishment of a special law that regulates the definition, rights, and obligations of the opposition within the framework of the Indonesian presidential system.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
University of Mataram (ID)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.