E-commerce rules in European Union and China: a comparative analysis

E-commerce is a vital component of the digital economy and has expanded to encompass all transactions conducted through information networks. With the emergence of “platformization,” increased vulnerability of consumers, and the need for stronger protection, proactive measures are necessary to enhance e-commerce law in order to effectively address complex issues related to online transactions and their environments. The EU and China are significant global economic entities with well-developed e-commerce sectors and substantial regulatory experience. Comparative research on their distinct e-commerce regulatory frameworks can promote mutual understanding and inspire innovative legal designs. This thesis aims to explore and compare the e-commerce regulatory frameworks established by the EU and China, identify the issues covered by regulation, and examine the proposed solutions within both frameworks. Through systematic analysis of these regulations, a comprehensive understanding of key values in modern digital society, including consumer protection, corporate coordination, national economic order, digital sovereignty, and the advancement of the digital economy, can be developed. The thesis is divided into three parts: the first part examines the overall normative systems on e-commerce in the EU and China; the second part focuses on specific regulations for e-commerce transactions, revealing legislative preferences in the EU and China; and the third part discusses the regulatory frameworks for the market and legal environments of e-commerce transactions, analyzing legislative innovations respectively realized in the EU and China.

Publication Details

Journal
AMS Dottorato Institutional Doctoral Theses Repository (University of Bologna)
Published
2025-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48676/unibo/amsdottorato/11763
Primary Topic
Theoretical and Computational Physics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

E-commerce rules in European Union and China: a comparative analysis

AMS Dottorato Institutional Doctoral Theses Repository (University of Bologna)
Theoretical and Computational Physics
article

E-commerce rules in European Union and China: a comparative analysis

article en

Abstract

E-commerce is a vital component of the digital economy and has expanded to encompass all transactions conducted through information networks. With the emergence of “platformization,” increased vulnerability of consumers, and the need for stronger protection, proactive measures are necessary to enhance e-commerce law in order to effectively address complex issues related to online transactions and their environments. The EU and China are significant global economic entities with well-developed e-commerce sectors and substantial regulatory experience. Comparative research on their distinct e-commerce regulatory frameworks can promote mutual understanding and inspire innovative legal designs. This thesis aims to explore and compare the e-commerce regulatory frameworks established by the EU and China, identify the issues covered by regulation, and examine the proposed solutions within both frameworks. Through systematic analysis of these regulations, a comprehensive understanding of key values in modern digital society, including consumer protection, corporate coordination, national economic order, digital sovereignty, and the advancement of the digital economy, can be developed. The thesis is divided into three parts: the first part examines the overall normative systems on e-commerce in the EU and China; the second part focuses on specific regulations for e-commerce transactions, revealing legislative preferences in the EU and China; and the third part discusses the regulatory frameworks for the market and legal environments of e-commerce transactions, analyzing legislative innovations respectively realized in the EU and China.

AMS Dottorato Institutional Doctoral Theses Repository (University of Bologna)
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Theoretical and Computational Physics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.