Circularity metrics and indicators for construction: gaps in current assessment methodologies and recommendations towards a standardized approach

Circular economy is an attractive concept for the building sector, which aims to operationalize sustainability by reducing its embodied emissions and resource consumption. Many circularity metrics have been developed to monitor these strategies, but they rely on heterogeneous methodologies that reflect a lack of consensus on the definition of circular economy. To help building stakeholders decide which metrics to use, we conducted a literature review of circularity metric research published between 2010 and 2025. We then developed a circularity assessment workflow and a taxonomy of circularity metrics across life cycle stages and circularity strategies. Results show that the construction and use phases are not well covered by existing circularity metrics, which mostly focus on closing material loops within design and end-of-life stages. We recommend using the established methods of material flow analysis and life cycle assessment as an inspiration to support the development of appropriate circularity metrics by (1) preserving functional properties of materials, products and buildings, (2) conducting multi-indicator assessments, and (3) returning to a traditional workflow that defines circularity goals and scope before developing tailored metrics (instead of vice versa, as often performed in the literature).

Publication Details

Journal
Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich)
Published
2025-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-c-000782931
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Circularity metrics and indicators for construction: gaps in current assessment methodologies and recommendations towards a standardized approach

Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich)
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

Circularity metrics and indicators for construction: gaps in current assessment methodologies and recommendations towards a standardized approach

article en

Abstract

Circular economy is an attractive concept for the building sector, which aims to operationalize sustainability by reducing its embodied emissions and resource consumption. Many circularity metrics have been developed to monitor these strategies, but they rely on heterogeneous methodologies that reflect a lack of consensus on the definition of circular economy. To help building stakeholders decide which metrics to use, we conducted a literature review of circularity metric research published between 2010 and 2025. We then developed a circularity assessment workflow and a taxonomy of circularity metrics across life cycle stages and circularity strategies. Results show that the construction and use phases are not well covered by existing circularity metrics, which mostly focus on closing material loops within design and end-of-life stages. We recommend using the established methods of material flow analysis and life cycle assessment as an inspiration to support the development of appropriate circularity metrics by (1) preserving functional properties of materials, products and buildings, (2) conducting multi-indicator assessments, and (3) returning to a traditional workflow that defines circularity goals and scope before developing tailored metrics (instead of vice versa, as often performed in the literature).

Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Circularity metrics and indicators for construction: gaps in current assessment methodologies and recommendations towards a standardized approach · Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS