Developing and Testing the Successful Change Measurement Scale: A New Model Based on a Novel Conceptualization of David Gleicher's Organizational Change Formula

Despite the widespread use of change management models in organizational settings, many remain unvalidated and are based more on practitioner observation than academic research. One such model is The Change Formula (TCF), a heuristic developed by David Gleicher in the 1960s to explain observed phenomena present within organizational change efforts. Although widely referenced and adapted, TCF has never undergone empirical validation of its latent factor structure. This dissertation addresses that gap by introducing the Successful Change Formula (SCF), a refined and novel version of TCF, and empirically tests its constructs through exploratory analysis. The study employed quantitative research to provide initial support for a valid and reliable measurement of successful change. Using data from 404 organizational change participants, multiple exploratory factor analyses (EFA), multi-dimensional scaling (MDS), and confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) were conducted to evaluate construct validity, item reliability, and model fit. Through iterative item refinement and scale development, an empirically supported three-factor hierarchical model emerged, comprising: 1) Conditions Needed for Change (C), 2) Intention to Change (I), and 3) Change Execution (E). The resulting model demonstrated acceptable internal consistency (α > .89), strong item loadings, and alignment with organizational change theory. This research advances change management theory by providing empirical support for a foundational framework. It provides initial support for a future, reliable, and valid instrument for practitioners and scholars seeking to influence and guide organizational change initiatives. Furthermore, the study also provides an initial indication of the scale’s future capability to predict successful change outcomes in organizations. By bridging a 60-year gap between theory and evidence, this dissertation lays the groundwork for future studies to refine the SCF model, examine its predictive capabilities, and enhance its practical applicability across diverse organizational contexts.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ScholarWorks@BGSU (Bowling Green State University)
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Developing and Testing the Successful Change Measurement Scale: A New Model Based on a Novel Conceptualization of David Gleicher's Organizational Change Formula

ScholarWorks@BGSU (Bowling Green State University)
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

Developing and Testing the Successful Change Measurement Scale: A New Model Based on a Novel Conceptualization of David Gleicher's Organizational Change Formula

article en

Abstract

Despite the widespread use of change management models in organizational settings, many remain unvalidated and are based more on practitioner observation than academic research. One such model is The Change Formula (TCF), a heuristic developed by David Gleicher in the 1960s to explain observed phenomena present within organizational change efforts. Although widely referenced and adapted, TCF has never undergone empirical validation of its latent factor structure. This dissertation addresses that gap by introducing the Successful Change Formula (SCF), a refined and novel version of TCF, and empirically tests its constructs through exploratory analysis. The study employed quantitative research to provide initial support for a valid and reliable measurement of successful change. Using data from 404 organizational change participants, multiple exploratory factor analyses (EFA), multi-dimensional scaling (MDS), and confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) were conducted to evaluate construct validity, item reliability, and model fit. Through iterative item refinement and scale development, an empirically supported three-factor hierarchical model emerged, comprising: 1) Conditions Needed for Change (C), 2) Intention to Change (I), and 3) Change Execution (E). The resulting model demonstrated acceptable internal consistency (α > .89), strong item loadings, and alignment with organizational change theory. This research advances change management theory by providing empirical support for a foundational framework. It provides initial support for a future, reliable, and valid instrument for practitioners and scholars seeking to influence and guide organizational change initiatives. Furthermore, the study also provides an initial indication of the scale’s future capability to predict successful change outcomes in organizations. By bridging a 60-year gap between theory and evidence, this dissertation lays the groundwork for future studies to refine the SCF model, examine its predictive capabilities, and enhance its practical applicability across diverse organizational contexts.

ScholarWorks@BGSU (Bowling Green State University)
Bowling Green State University (US)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.