Why Are All the Good Folks Leaving: A Study of Staff Turnover in Higher Education

The sustainability of higher education institutions hinges on the retention of skilled staff, yet an alarming trend has emerged, non-teaching staff are leaving academia at increasing rates. This qualitative, phenomenological study explores the experiences of 16 former higher education staff members who transitioned to careers outside academia within the last five years. Through semi-structured interviews and a focus group, this research identified eight key factors that influenced their decisions to leave: pressure to perform, inadequate compensation, toxic or poor leadership, challenges with work-life balance, low perceived organizational support, limited career advancement opportunities, inflexible work-from-home policies, and status disparities between faculty and staff. Findings revealed that issues including micromanagement, excessive workloads, and the consistent undervaluing of staff contributions prompted departures, even among those who were highly dedicated to supporting student success. The study’s results call for policy reform in higher education workplaces to reduce turnover. Recommendations include implementing career pathways for staff, improving leadership training, supporting hybrid work models, and fostering cultures of psychological safety. By highlighting the voices of non-teaching staff, this research offers a vital perspective that is often overlooked in literature.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ScholarWorks@BGSU (Bowling Green State University)
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Why Are All the Good Folks Leaving: A Study of Staff Turnover in Higher Education

ScholarWorks@BGSU (Bowling Green State University)
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

Why Are All the Good Folks Leaving: A Study of Staff Turnover in Higher Education

article en

Abstract

The sustainability of higher education institutions hinges on the retention of skilled staff, yet an alarming trend has emerged, non-teaching staff are leaving academia at increasing rates. This qualitative, phenomenological study explores the experiences of 16 former higher education staff members who transitioned to careers outside academia within the last five years. Through semi-structured interviews and a focus group, this research identified eight key factors that influenced their decisions to leave: pressure to perform, inadequate compensation, toxic or poor leadership, challenges with work-life balance, low perceived organizational support, limited career advancement opportunities, inflexible work-from-home policies, and status disparities between faculty and staff. Findings revealed that issues including micromanagement, excessive workloads, and the consistent undervaluing of staff contributions prompted departures, even among those who were highly dedicated to supporting student success. The study’s results call for policy reform in higher education workplaces to reduce turnover. Recommendations include implementing career pathways for staff, improving leadership training, supporting hybrid work models, and fostering cultures of psychological safety. By highlighting the voices of non-teaching staff, this research offers a vital perspective that is often overlooked in literature.

ScholarWorks@BGSU (Bowling Green State University)
Bowling Green State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.