The Impact of Robotics in Food Service

Robots and humans in the food service industry were the subjects of this quantitative researchthat aimed to compare their efficiency and security. In particular, it sought to provide proof ofhow human and robot workers fared in terms of general performance and safety. These werecategorized into the following scales: perceived intelligence, perceived safety, dependability,responsiveness, assurance, social capacity, and predicted service quality. Expert views on therelative safety of human and robot workers in the food service business were also an aim of thisstudy. The need to assess the efficacy and security of robots in comparison to human workerswas driven by the fast expansion of robots in the food service sector. This research sought toinvestigate this contrast based on expert opinions and was based on the complex adaptivesystems (CAS) theory. Statistical tests including Wilcoxon Sign ranking, ANOVA, Spearman Rank,and Kendall Tau were used in a quantitative descriptive investigation. The results indicated thathuman workers and food service robots were equally safe and effective. Dissecting theperformance metrics revealed notable variations in Anticipated Service Quality andResponsiveness, with food service robots achieving higher medians for the latter. According tothese findings, when it came to performance and safety, humans rated human workers in thefood service industry higher than robots.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-08-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16927816
Primary Topic
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Impact of Robotics in Food Service

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
article

The Impact of Robotics in Food Service

article en

Abstract

Robots and humans in the food service industry were the subjects of this quantitative researchthat aimed to compare their efficiency and security. In particular, it sought to provide proof ofhow human and robot workers fared in terms of general performance and safety. These werecategorized into the following scales: perceived intelligence, perceived safety, dependability,responsiveness, assurance, social capacity, and predicted service quality. Expert views on therelative safety of human and robot workers in the food service business were also an aim of thisstudy. The need to assess the efficacy and security of robots in comparison to human workerswas driven by the fast expansion of robots in the food service sector. This research sought toinvestigate this contrast based on expert opinions and was based on the complex adaptivesystems (CAS) theory. Statistical tests including Wilcoxon Sign ranking, ANOVA, Spearman Rank,and Kendall Tau were used in a quantitative descriptive investigation. The results indicated thathuman workers and food service robots were equally safe and effective. Dissecting theperformance metrics revealed notable variations in Anticipated Service Quality andResponsiveness, with food service robots achieving higher medians for the latter. According tothese findings, when it came to performance and safety, humans rated human workers in thefood service industry higher than robots.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.