Quick, Tangible, Playful: Reducing Barriers to Feedback

Often, we as researchers and practitioners want to get feedback on an activity. This is a surprisingly complex task, because we need to convince people to give feedback and use the time they spend interacting with us wisely. A common solution is to offer an online survey and to provide access to the survey using a QR code. This makes feedback much easier to collect and analyse. But it is not clear how many potential participants we lose by offering just a QR code option. We studied this question by comparing three feedback options at two exhibitions staged by the University of Lapland Design team. The options were tangible feedback, a paper survey, and a QR code survey. We found that most participants engaged with the tangible options, followed by paper. Only one person per exhibition used the QR code. We discuss implications for analogue versus digital feedback.

Publication Details

Journal
LaCRIS (University of Lapland)
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18420/muc2025-mci-ws14-181
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quick, Tangible, Playful: Reducing Barriers to Feedback

LaCRIS (University of Lapland)
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

Quick, Tangible, Playful: Reducing Barriers to Feedback

article en

Abstract

Often, we as researchers and practitioners want to get feedback on an activity. This is a surprisingly complex task, because we need to convince people to give feedback and use the time they spend interacting with us wisely. A common solution is to offer an online survey and to provide access to the survey using a QR code. This makes feedback much easier to collect and analyse. But it is not clear how many potential participants we lose by offering just a QR code option. We studied this question by comparing three feedback options at two exhibitions staged by the University of Lapland Design team. The options were tangible feedback, a paper survey, and a QR code survey. We found that most participants engaged with the tangible options, followed by paper. Only one person per exhibition used the QR code. We discuss implications for analogue versus digital feedback.

LaCRIS (University of Lapland)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.