Hidden but heard

In this dissertation, I investigated the disclosure decision-making process that people with invisible disabilities (PWID) navigate when disclosing their disabilities, using a mixed-methods approach. Of the mixed methods designs, I employed sequential exploratory design using two phases. I began my investigation with a rigorous review of the historical underpinnings and previous conceptualizations of disability. Following this review, I conducted the first phase (qualitative), which informed the development of the second phase (quantitative; Creswell & Plano, 2017). In Study 1, I employed cognitive interviews to assess widely used disclosure-related survey measures. During my analysis, I identified a range of response errors related to comprehension, recall, judgment, response process, and accessibility. These findings demonstrated how impairments shaped cognitive processes when completing surveys and underscored the need to refine measurement tools for disability-related research.

Publication Details

Journal
Iowa Research Online (The University of Iowa)
Published
2025-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25820/etd.007998
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hidden but heard

Iowa Research Online (The University of Iowa)
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

Hidden but heard

article en

Abstract

In this dissertation, I investigated the disclosure decision-making process that people with invisible disabilities (PWID) navigate when disclosing their disabilities, using a mixed-methods approach. Of the mixed methods designs, I employed sequential exploratory design using two phases. I began my investigation with a rigorous review of the historical underpinnings and previous conceptualizations of disability. Following this review, I conducted the first phase (qualitative), which informed the development of the second phase (quantitative; Creswell & Plano, 2017). In Study 1, I employed cognitive interviews to assess widely used disclosure-related survey measures. During my analysis, I identified a range of response errors related to comprehension, recall, judgment, response process, and accessibility. These findings demonstrated how impairments shaped cognitive processes when completing surveys and underscored the need to refine measurement tools for disability-related research.

Iowa Research Online (The University of Iowa)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.