Structural Performance of Tall Buildings with Bracing and Infill Walls Under Lateral Loads: A Review

High-rise buildings are particularly susceptible to lateral forces induced by seismic and wind loads, which often govern their overall performance and safety. Conventional reinforced concrete (RC) frames, although effective in carrying vertical loads, lack sufficient stiffness to resist such lateral actions, making them prone to excessive displacement, inter-story drift, and even structural instability. To address these challenges, lateral load resisting elements such as masonry infill walls and steel bracing systems are increasingly incorporated into RC frames to enhance seismic resistance. This paper presents a comparative study on the effectiveness of different lateral load resisting systems in improving the seismic performance of high-rise buildings. The investigation considers three structural configurations: bare frame, masonry infilled frame, and externally braced frame with X-bracing. A 12-story reinforced concrete building model (R+12) with 3 m floor height is analyzed using CSI ETABS software under seismic Zone V conditions and response spectrum analysis for soft soil. Key performance parameters including base shear, lateral displacement, inter-story drift, and moment distribution are evaluated to assess the influence of each system on overall seismic behavior. The results reveal that the inclusion of masonry infill significantly reduces the demands on beams and columns by increasing lateral stiffness and redistributing forces. However, the most notable improvement is observed with the use of external steel bracing, particularly X-braces, which provide superior stability and effectively minimize displacements. Steel-braced frames also demonstrate greater cost-efficiency compared to masonry infill, while ensuring higher ductility and energy dissipation. In comparison, bare frames exhibit the least stability and maximum lateral displacements. Overall, the study confirms that lateral load resisting elements play a crucial role in enhancing the seismic performance of RC frames, with steel bracing emerging as the most effective solution, followed by masonry infill..

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-08-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16925530
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Structural Performance of Tall Buildings with Bracing and Infill Walls Under Lateral Loads: A Review

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

Structural Performance of Tall Buildings with Bracing and Infill Walls Under Lateral Loads: A Review

article en

Abstract

High-rise buildings are particularly susceptible to lateral forces induced by seismic and wind loads, which often govern their overall performance and safety. Conventional reinforced concrete (RC) frames, although effective in carrying vertical loads, lack sufficient stiffness to resist such lateral actions, making them prone to excessive displacement, inter-story drift, and even structural instability. To address these challenges, lateral load resisting elements such as masonry infill walls and steel bracing systems are increasingly incorporated into RC frames to enhance seismic resistance. This paper presents a comparative study on the effectiveness of different lateral load resisting systems in improving the seismic performance of high-rise buildings. The investigation considers three structural configurations: bare frame, masonry infilled frame, and externally braced frame with X-bracing. A 12-story reinforced concrete building model (R+12) with 3 m floor height is analyzed using CSI ETABS software under seismic Zone V conditions and response spectrum analysis for soft soil. Key performance parameters including base shear, lateral displacement, inter-story drift, and moment distribution are evaluated to assess the influence of each system on overall seismic behavior. The results reveal that the inclusion of masonry infill significantly reduces the demands on beams and columns by increasing lateral stiffness and redistributing forces. However, the most notable improvement is observed with the use of external steel bracing, particularly X-braces, which provide superior stability and effectively minimize displacements. Steel-braced frames also demonstrate greater cost-efficiency compared to masonry infill, while ensuring higher ductility and energy dissipation. In comparison, bare frames exhibit the least stability and maximum lateral displacements. Overall, the study confirms that lateral load resisting elements play a crucial role in enhancing the seismic performance of RC frames, with steel bracing emerging as the most effective solution, followed by masonry infill..

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Infinity (United States) (US), Dr. Hari Singh Gour University (IN)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.