Public Policies on Special Education in Federal Institutes of Education, Science, and Technology

This article discusses public policies on Special Education in the context of Federal Institutes of Education, Science and Technology and the inclusion of people with disabilities, based on bibliographic and documentary research.The theoretical framework is provided by Frigotto (2016), Garcia (2017), Schmidt (2018), Silva (2024), among others.To understand how these policies are recontextualized in the IFS, the materiality of the data collected revealed a theoretical corpus structured in two dimensions: Public policies for the inclusion of students with disabilities in professional and technological education in Brazil; and Special Education Policy in Federal Institutes: Advances, contradictions, inertia, and perspectives.The results indicate that public policies for Special Education are in an initial phase of implementation in the IFS.The implementation of Special Education policies as a right to education will depend on isolated actions by each institution, to the detriment of a structured and funded national policy.This process is strained by the logic of capital that surrounds the institutions.As a result, they are recontextualized in a contradictory manner, between a proposal for training workers and the neglect of guaranteeing humane conditions for the materialization of quality education for the school inclusion of students with disabilities.

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Human Sciences Research
Published
2025-07-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22533/at.ed.5585112523078
Primary Topic
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Public Policies on Special Education in Federal Institutes of Education, Science, and Technology

International Journal of Human Sciences Research
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
article

Public Policies on Special Education in Federal Institutes of Education, Science, and Technology

article en

Abstract

This article discusses public policies on Special Education in the context of Federal Institutes of Education, Science and Technology and the inclusion of people with disabilities, based on bibliographic and documentary research.The theoretical framework is provided by Frigotto (2016), Garcia (2017), Schmidt (2018), Silva (2024), among others.To understand how these policies are recontextualized in the IFS, the materiality of the data collected revealed a theoretical corpus structured in two dimensions: Public policies for the inclusion of students with disabilities in professional and technological education in Brazil; and Special Education Policy in Federal Institutes: Advances, contradictions, inertia, and perspectives.The results indicate that public policies for Special Education are in an initial phase of implementation in the IFS.The implementation of Special Education policies as a right to education will depend on isolated actions by each institution, to the detriment of a structured and funded national policy.This process is strained by the logic of capital that surrounds the institutions.As a result, they are recontextualized in a contradictory manner, between a proposal for training workers and the neglect of guaranteeing humane conditions for the materialization of quality education for the school inclusion of students with disabilities.

International Journal of Human Sciences ResearchVol. 5(11)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.