Designing Effective Feedback in Educational Programming Assistants: Recommendations, Analysis, and Practical Guidelines

Learning to program involves understanding theory, algorithms, and coding, which many students find challenging. While feedback is critical for success, its quality and availability are often limited by resource constraints. This paper evaluates how feedback is currently provided in an introductory programming course and derives guidance for both programming assistants and human tutors. Building on six evidence-based feedback elements from prior research, we analyzed 146 student–tutor forum threads, focusing on Individualization, Understandability, and Guidance. Our findings show that experienced tutors frequently used explanations, examples, and tailored advice, helping resolve most issues in a single response. Students often submitted detailed questions with code and error messages, revealing common challenges and providing useful context for automated support. These insights inform practical design recommendations to improve feedback quality in educational tools and human instruction alike. By combining theoretical and empirical insights, the study offers guidance for designing effective, student-centered feedback in programming education.

Publication Details

Journal
Gesellschaft für Informatik (GI)
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18420/muc2025-mci-wip-338
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Designing Effective Feedback in Educational Programming Assistants: Recommendations, Analysis, and Practical Guidelines

Gesellschaft für Informatik (GI)
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

Designing Effective Feedback in Educational Programming Assistants: Recommendations, Analysis, and Practical Guidelines

article en

Abstract

Learning to program involves understanding theory, algorithms, and coding, which many students find challenging. While feedback is critical for success, its quality and availability are often limited by resource constraints. This paper evaluates how feedback is currently provided in an introductory programming course and derives guidance for both programming assistants and human tutors. Building on six evidence-based feedback elements from prior research, we analyzed 146 student–tutor forum threads, focusing on Individualization, Understandability, and Guidance. Our findings show that experienced tutors frequently used explanations, examples, and tailored advice, helping resolve most issues in a single response. Students often submitted detailed questions with code and error messages, revealing common challenges and providing useful context for automated support. These insights inform practical design recommendations to improve feedback quality in educational tools and human instruction alike. By combining theoretical and empirical insights, the study offers guidance for designing effective, student-centered feedback in programming education.

Gesellschaft für Informatik (GI)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.