The Limitations of the Quantified Self for Persuasive Self-Optimization Apps

This paper explores how the quantified self and the use of persuasive apps influence various activities, such as sports, cooking and eating, sleeping, and reading. We aim to find out how the experiencing self and remembering self differ in terms of considerations for these activities and how these differences could influence a person's expectations and experiences. We conducted a scenario-based survey, where a group of 51 participants was divided into two groups associated with both perspectives. The results show how these considerations align with those reported in the literature and those implemented in currently available persuasive apps. With this study, we provide insights in the use of current apps and for the design of future apps that are built upon the quantified self.

Publication Details

Journal
Gesellschaft für Informatik (GI)
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18420/muc2025-mci-ws04-263
Primary Topic
Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Limitations of the Quantified Self for Persuasive Self-Optimization Apps

Gesellschaft für Informatik (GI)
Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies
article

The Limitations of the Quantified Self for Persuasive Self-Optimization Apps

article en

Abstract

This paper explores how the quantified self and the use of persuasive apps influence various activities, such as sports, cooking and eating, sleeping, and reading. We aim to find out how the experiencing self and remembering self differ in terms of considerations for these activities and how these differences could influence a person's expectations and experiences. We conducted a scenario-based survey, where a group of 51 participants was divided into two groups associated with both perspectives. The results show how these considerations align with those reported in the literature and those implemented in currently available persuasive apps. With this study, we provide insights in the use of current apps and for the design of future apps that are built upon the quantified self.

Gesellschaft für Informatik (GI)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.