Scientific data governance and authorship policy in transdisciplinary research and innovation environmental projects

Effective scientific data governance and equitable authorship attribution are essential to the success of large-scale, transdisciplinary research initiatives. Drawing on our experience in two major programmes, namely “Damage Diagnosis Programme following the Brumadinho dam disaster” in the Paraopeba River basin (PDD) and “IBI UHE-Furnas & UFMG” project, in the Grande River basin; each involving hundreds of investigators from academia, industry and civil society, we developed and implemented a comprehensive governance model. Core components include (1) field data collection with standardised protocols, which are curated to maintain consistency, reliability and reproducibility and (2) a structured authorship policy, which needs to be as objective as possible and guarantee fairness of credit among participants. We thus developed a policy based on the CRediT taxonomy, where we require least four contributorship roles (including writing as a mandatory one) for authorship and offering co-authorship eligibility to those meeting four roles; and a diverse Scientific Committee to oversee proposal review, manage conflicts of interest and prevent redundant research. All manuscripts must undergo centralised submission and use only validated datasets, while acknowledgements and compliance statements align with relevant data-protection and ethical regulations. Implementation of this framework has clarified contributor roles, mitigated gift and ghost authorship, fostered transparent workload distribution and enhanced inclusivity, particularly for early-career and under-represented researchers. Our findings demonstrate that a deliberately flexible yet rigorous governance-and-authorship policy can balance autonomy, fairness and accountability. This model provides a replicable blueprint for other large, collaborative research programmes seeking to fairly uphold integrity, promote diversity and accelerate trustworthy scientific discovery.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-08-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16929779
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Scientific data governance and authorship policy in transdisciplinary research and innovation environmental projects

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

Scientific data governance and authorship policy in transdisciplinary research and innovation environmental projects

article en

Abstract

Effective scientific data governance and equitable authorship attribution are essential to the success of large-scale, transdisciplinary research initiatives. Drawing on our experience in two major programmes, namely “Damage Diagnosis Programme following the Brumadinho dam disaster” in the Paraopeba River basin (PDD) and “IBI UHE-Furnas & UFMG” project, in the Grande River basin; each involving hundreds of investigators from academia, industry and civil society, we developed and implemented a comprehensive governance model. Core components include (1) field data collection with standardised protocols, which are curated to maintain consistency, reliability and reproducibility and (2) a structured authorship policy, which needs to be as objective as possible and guarantee fairness of credit among participants. We thus developed a policy based on the CRediT taxonomy, where we require least four contributorship roles (including writing as a mandatory one) for authorship and offering co-authorship eligibility to those meeting four roles; and a diverse Scientific Committee to oversee proposal review, manage conflicts of interest and prevent redundant research. All manuscripts must undergo centralised submission and use only validated datasets, while acknowledgements and compliance statements align with relevant data-protection and ethical regulations. Implementation of this framework has clarified contributor roles, mitigated gift and ghost authorship, fostered transparent workload distribution and enhanced inclusivity, particularly for early-career and under-represented researchers. Our findings demonstrate that a deliberately flexible yet rigorous governance-and-authorship policy can balance autonomy, fairness and accountability. This model provides a replicable blueprint for other large, collaborative research programmes seeking to fairly uphold integrity, promote diversity and accelerate trustworthy scientific discovery.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.