Sporting the Sacred: Redescribing the Study of Religion in the Sociology of Sport

Nearly 50 years ago, Harry Edwards included “religiosity” as a category in his explication of “the sports creed.” Edwards recognized then that the cultural constellation of discourses and practices commonly labeled “sacred religion” was a “conspicuous element” of the social institution of sport. Reflecting on the failure of sport sociological discourse on religion/sport to acknowledge Edwards’ critical work, I show that beyond topical lacuna, the way that the sport/religion discourse has been constructed reifies these twinned sui generis categories as decidedly uncritical objects of study. The results are approaches to studying religion/sport that, while “tired” and “weary” continue to traffic in liberal modern political taxonomies. “Religion” thus described lacks analytic precision as a scholarly category while additionally abrogating the extent to which, as a scholarly taxonomy, it exists in relation to colonial epistemologies and structures and racial formations.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sociology of Sport Journal
Published
2025-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1123/ssj.2024-0237
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sporting the Sacred: Redescribing the Study of Religion in the Sociology of Sport

1 citations
Sociology of Sport Journal
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
2.48
article

Sporting the Sacred: Redescribing the Study of Religion in the Sociology of Sport

article en
1 citations

Abstract

Nearly 50 years ago, Harry Edwards included “religiosity” as a category in his explication of “the sports creed.” Edwards recognized then that the cultural constellation of discourses and practices commonly labeled “sacred religion” was a “conspicuous element” of the social institution of sport. Reflecting on the failure of sport sociological discourse on religion/sport to acknowledge Edwards’ critical work, I show that beyond topical lacuna, the way that the sport/religion discourse has been constructed reifies these twinned sui generis categories as decidedly uncritical objects of study. The results are approaches to studying religion/sport that, while “tired” and “weary” continue to traffic in liberal modern political taxonomies. “Religion” thus described lacks analytic precision as a scholarly category while additionally abrogating the extent to which, as a scholarly taxonomy, it exists in relation to colonial epistemologies and structures and racial formations.

Sociology of Sport JournalVol. 43(1)
Pennsylvania State University (US), Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.