UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS' EXPERIENCES WITH ASSUMPTIONS OF INFERIORITY IN ENGINEERING GROUP WORK SETTINGS

People stereotype women to be less skilled and competent in STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) than men [Nosek, B. A., Smyth, F. L., Sriram, N., Lindner, N. M., Devos, T., Ayala, A., Bar-Anan, Y., Bergh, R., Cai, H., Gonsalkorale, K., & Kesebir, S. (2009). National differences in gender-science stereotypes predict national sex differences in science and math achievement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(26), 10593-10597]. These stereotypic beliefs can leak out in words and behaviors as microaggressions-defined as brief everyday verbal, behavioral, or environmental slights directed toward someone due to their social category [Sue, D. W. (2010). Microaggressions in everyday life: Race, gender, and sexual orientation. John Wiley & Sons].-and can be a hindrance to women's persistence and inclusion in STEM fields. In the current research we utilized a mixed methods approach to document the content and presence of microaggressions in undergraduate engineering group work settings among women and men. In Study 1, focus groups with women and men engineering students (N = 43) revealed that women reported experiencing microaggressions in the form of assumptions of inferiority or behaviors suggesting that they possess inferior STEM skills and competence. In Study 2, we developed a behavioral coding rubric to document the presence of assumptions of inferiority among women and men students (N = 260) in engineering teams as judged by trained independent observers. In Study 2 observations revealed that more women were the target of assumptions of inferiority than men, corroborating self-report findings. Moreover, although our studies focused on gender-based microaggressions, Study 2 observational coding revealed People of Color were the targets of assumptions of inferiority more than White people. Results complement prior self-report data and indicate that diversity and inclusion efforts should focus on reducing the presence of microaggressions in peer STEM contexts.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1615/jwomenminorscieneng.2025052967
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS' EXPERIENCES WITH ASSUMPTIONS OF INFERIORITY IN ENGINEERING GROUP WORK SETTINGS

Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS' EXPERIENCES WITH ASSUMPTIONS OF INFERIORITY IN ENGINEERING GROUP WORK SETTINGS

article en

Abstract

People stereotype women to be less skilled and competent in STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) than men [Nosek, B. A., Smyth, F. L., Sriram, N., Lindner, N. M., Devos, T., Ayala, A., Bar-Anan, Y., Bergh, R., Cai, H., Gonsalkorale, K., & Kesebir, S. (2009). National differences in gender-science stereotypes predict national sex differences in science and math achievement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(26), 10593-10597]. These stereotypic beliefs can leak out in words and behaviors as microaggressions-defined as brief everyday verbal, behavioral, or environmental slights directed toward someone due to their social category [Sue, D. W. (2010). Microaggressions in everyday life: Race, gender, and sexual orientation. John Wiley & Sons].-and can be a hindrance to women's persistence and inclusion in STEM fields. In the current research we utilized a mixed methods approach to document the content and presence of microaggressions in undergraduate engineering group work settings among women and men. In Study 1, focus groups with women and men engineering students (N = 43) revealed that women reported experiencing microaggressions in the form of assumptions of inferiority or behaviors suggesting that they possess inferior STEM skills and competence. In Study 2, we developed a behavioral coding rubric to document the presence of assumptions of inferiority among women and men students (N = 260) in engineering teams as judged by trained independent observers. In Study 2 observations revealed that more women were the target of assumptions of inferiority than men, corroborating self-report findings. Moreover, although our studies focused on gender-based microaggressions, Study 2 observational coding revealed People of Color were the targets of assumptions of inferiority more than White people. Results complement prior self-report data and indicate that diversity and inclusion efforts should focus on reducing the presence of microaggressions in peer STEM contexts.

Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and EngineeringVol. 31(6)
Michigan Technological University (US), Grinnell College (US), University of Michigan (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.