Estimating optimal dynamic treatment regime with model selection in STAR*D trial

This NDA Study is linked to the paper "Model selection with uncertainty in estimating optimal dynamic treatment regimes" under preparation for statistical journal submission. We applied our model selection methodology to STAR*D to learn/estimate the optimal dynamic treatment regime for patients who did not achieve remission from initial treatment. We restrict our attention to two treatment options, augmentation and switch, for each decision. The original STAR*D data consists of four levels where all patients were treated with citalopram at level 1 and only switch options were available for patients involved in level 4. We therefore only focus on level 2 (level 2 plus level 2A if level 2A available) and level 3. The decision rules considered at the two stages (i.e. level 2 and level 3) are restricted to interpretable ones. Specifically, we consider linear and tree-based rules.

Publication Details

Journal
National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) Data Archive Repository
Published
2025-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15154/zazg-8261
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Estimating optimal dynamic treatment regime with model selection in STAR*D trial

National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) Data Archive Repository
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

Estimating optimal dynamic treatment regime with model selection in STAR*D trial

article en

Abstract

This NDA Study is linked to the paper "Model selection with uncertainty in estimating optimal dynamic treatment regimes" under preparation for statistical journal submission. We applied our model selection methodology to STAR*D to learn/estimate the optimal dynamic treatment regime for patients who did not achieve remission from initial treatment. We restrict our attention to two treatment options, augmentation and switch, for each decision. The original STAR*D data consists of four levels where all patients were treated with citalopram at level 1 and only switch options were available for patients involved in level 4. We therefore only focus on level 2 (level 2 plus level 2A if level 2A available) and level 3. The decision rules considered at the two stages (i.e. level 2 and level 3) are restricted to interpretable ones. Specifically, we consider linear and tree-based rules.

National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) Data Archive Repository
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.