Investigating the Value of Umbilical Artery Eucapnic pH as a Biomarker for Adverse Neonatal Outcomes: A Systematic Review

Introduction: Metabolic acidosis at birth is associated with severe neonatal outcomes, making umbilical artery gas analysis crucial for management. However, conventional potential of hydrogen (pH) and base deficit (BD) methods have limitations in neonates. Neonatal eucapnic pH (pH-euc-n), derived from the pH and partial pressure of carbon dioxide, reflects neonatal metabolic acidosis more accurately, potentially providing a better assessment than conventional biomarkers. This study aimed to assess the utility of pH-euc-n for predicting adverse neonatal outcomes. Methods: A systematic search was conducted of PubMed, Web of Sciences, Scopus, and Embase on September 24, 2024. Articles comparing pH-euc-n with standard umbilical artery pH and BD for detecting neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) or neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admissions were included. Data on the predictive ability of each biomarker for neonatal HIE/NICU admission were collected. The certainty of the evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria. Results: Five retrospective cohort studies were included. We found very low level of evidence supporting the superiority of pH-euc-n over the standard pH for predicting HIE/NICU admission. Moderate evidence supported pH-euc-n for predicting HIE/NICU admissions in neonates with pH 7.00–7.15, the evidence was very low for pH ≤7.00. Similarly, low evidence favored pH-euc-n over BD and retained pH (combined pH-euc-n and standard pH) over standard pH for predicting these outcomes. Conclusions: pH-euc-n is a calculated value derived from an algorithm applied to measured pH (rather than a direct measurement), designed to eliminate the respiratory component and isolate the metabolic component of acidemia. While hypercapnia present at birth typically resolves rapidly after stabilization of breathing, the metabolic component persists, offering valuable insight into neonatal acidemia. This method serves as a complement to, rather than a replacement for, standard pH assessment, particularly in cases of significant respiratory acidosis. Importantly, its calculation entails no additional risks, constraints, or costs. Despite its theoretical advantages, this review found limited evidence that pH-euc-n outperforms standard pH or BD in identifying the risk of HIE, although moderate evidence supports its diagnostic accuracy in high-risk cases (pH = 7.00–7.15). Consequently, further research is warranted to clarify its clinical utility and establish its role in neonatal care.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Maternal and Children s Health
Published
2025-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1159/000545497
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigating the Value of Umbilical Artery Eucapnic pH as a Biomarker for Adverse Neonatal Outcomes: A Systematic Review

Maternal and Children s Health
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

Investigating the Value of Umbilical Artery Eucapnic pH as a Biomarker for Adverse Neonatal Outcomes: A Systematic Review

article en

Abstract

Introduction: Metabolic acidosis at birth is associated with severe neonatal outcomes, making umbilical artery gas analysis crucial for management. However, conventional potential of hydrogen (pH) and base deficit (BD) methods have limitations in neonates. Neonatal eucapnic pH (pH-euc-n), derived from the pH and partial pressure of carbon dioxide, reflects neonatal metabolic acidosis more accurately, potentially providing a better assessment than conventional biomarkers. This study aimed to assess the utility of pH-euc-n for predicting adverse neonatal outcomes. Methods: A systematic search was conducted of PubMed, Web of Sciences, Scopus, and Embase on September 24, 2024. Articles comparing pH-euc-n with standard umbilical artery pH and BD for detecting neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) or neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admissions were included. Data on the predictive ability of each biomarker for neonatal HIE/NICU admission were collected. The certainty of the evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria. Results: Five retrospective cohort studies were included. We found very low level of evidence supporting the superiority of pH-euc-n over the standard pH for predicting HIE/NICU admission. Moderate evidence supported pH-euc-n for predicting HIE/NICU admissions in neonates with pH 7.00–7.15, the evidence was very low for pH ≤7.00. Similarly, low evidence favored pH-euc-n over BD and retained pH (combined pH-euc-n and standard pH) over standard pH for predicting these outcomes. Conclusions: pH-euc-n is a calculated value derived from an algorithm applied to measured pH (rather than a direct measurement), designed to eliminate the respiratory component and isolate the metabolic component of acidemia. While hypercapnia present at birth typically resolves rapidly after stabilization of breathing, the metabolic component persists, offering valuable insight into neonatal acidemia. This method serves as a complement to, rather than a replacement for, standard pH assessment, particularly in cases of significant respiratory acidosis. Importantly, its calculation entails no additional risks, constraints, or costs. Despite its theoretical advantages, this review found limited evidence that pH-euc-n outperforms standard pH or BD in identifying the risk of HIE, although moderate evidence supports its diagnostic accuracy in high-risk cases (pH = 7.00–7.15). Consequently, further research is warranted to clarify its clinical utility and establish its role in neonatal care.

Maternal and Children s HealthVol. 1(1)
Tehran University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.