Tort Liability for Failure to Age Gate: A Promising Regulatory Response to Digital Public Health Hazards

Abstract Tort liability for failure to “age gate” is a promising legal response to the public health hazards of AI, social media, sports gambling, and other digital spaces. Tort liability for failure to “age gate” hinges liability for harms to minors on an app’s failure to take reasonable steps to prevent minors from gaining access or otherwise to apply appropriate governance rules, such as privacy-protective default settings or ensuring genuine parental consent. While no one legal response is a panacea, tort liability for failure to age gate carries several distinctive advantages that make it a particularly promising option at this stage of an evolving regulatory challenge. These advantages include avoiding section 230 preemption, mitigating First Amendment barriers, ensuring fit with existing tort doctrine, assessing technical viability, and minimizing harms to innovation. The relative insulation of the tort system from industry manipulation as compared to legislative processes, and consistency with the need to balance prevention with access in regulating addictive technologies are added bonuses.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Tort Law
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/jtl-2025-0018
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tort Liability for Failure to Age Gate: A Promising Regulatory Response to Digital Public Health Hazards

Journal of Tort Law
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

Tort Liability for Failure to Age Gate: A Promising Regulatory Response to Digital Public Health Hazards

article en

Abstract

Abstract Tort liability for failure to “age gate” is a promising legal response to the public health hazards of AI, social media, sports gambling, and other digital spaces. Tort liability for failure to “age gate” hinges liability for harms to minors on an app’s failure to take reasonable steps to prevent minors from gaining access or otherwise to apply appropriate governance rules, such as privacy-protective default settings or ensuring genuine parental consent. While no one legal response is a panacea, tort liability for failure to age gate carries several distinctive advantages that make it a particularly promising option at this stage of an evolving regulatory challenge. These advantages include avoiding section 230 preemption, mitigating First Amendment barriers, ensuring fit with existing tort doctrine, assessing technical viability, and minimizing harms to innovation. The relative insulation of the tort system from industry manipulation as compared to legislative processes, and consistency with the need to balance prevention with access in regulating addictive technologies are added bonuses.

Journal of Tort LawVol. 18(1)
Cambridge Health Alliance (US), Emory University (US), University of Michigan (US), Stanford Medicine (US), Villanova University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.