Deliveroo: human rights, labour subordination and the technology of digital platforms

This article uses the recent Deliveroo case as a springboard to explore two seemingly unrelated themes: the human rights approach to employment status litigation and the role of technology in digital platforms. The human rights approach is critiqued not so much for depoliticising labour demands, as the argument often is, but because it does little to remedy contractualised approaches to employment status. The article argues that if the latter are replaced by socio-economic considerations, the human rights route to employment status will be superfluous. Technology comes in as part of said socio-economic considerations. Specifically, it is argued that labour law must be re-informed by a socio-economic/class approach, if it is to reflect its historic rationale of corrective intervention in the conflict between the working and the capitalist classes. Here, the working class is understood in terms of economic subordination to capital, with platform technology exemplifying this dynamic. Positioned within the broader context of valorisation and surplus value extraction, the technology of digital platforms is seen as an instrument of class domination. Consequently, workers' subjection to such technology, once understood as a reflection of subordination, should suffice to extend labour protections to them.

Publication Details

Journal
BIROn (Birkbeck, University of London)
Published
2025-08-11
Primary Topic
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deliveroo: human rights, labour subordination and the technology of digital platforms

BIROn (Birkbeck, University of London)
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
article

Deliveroo: human rights, labour subordination and the technology of digital platforms

article en

Abstract

This article uses the recent Deliveroo case as a springboard to explore two seemingly unrelated themes: the human rights approach to employment status litigation and the role of technology in digital platforms. The human rights approach is critiqued not so much for depoliticising labour demands, as the argument often is, but because it does little to remedy contractualised approaches to employment status. The article argues that if the latter are replaced by socio-economic considerations, the human rights route to employment status will be superfluous. Technology comes in as part of said socio-economic considerations. Specifically, it is argued that labour law must be re-informed by a socio-economic/class approach, if it is to reflect its historic rationale of corrective intervention in the conflict between the working and the capitalist classes. Here, the working class is understood in terms of economic subordination to capital, with platform technology exemplifying this dynamic. Positioned within the broader context of valorisation and surplus value extraction, the technology of digital platforms is seen as an instrument of class domination. Consequently, workers' subjection to such technology, once understood as a reflection of subordination, should suffice to extend labour protections to them.

BIROn (Birkbeck, University of London)
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Deliveroo: human rights, labour subordination and the technology of digital platforms · BIROn (Birkbeck, University of London) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS