Stakeholders’ Perceptions of Undergraduate and Postgraduate Strength and Conditioning Education in the United Kingdom: A Survey Study

The number of strength and conditioning (S&C) degrees in the United Kingdom has grown alongside the discipline's popularity. The design and development of these degrees are influenced by various stakeholders, including S&C association representatives, potential employers, degree representatives, students, and graduates. Prior to this study, the collective perceptions of these stakeholders regarding UK S&C degrees had not been researched. This study filled this gap by reporting on the results of 73 participants who completed a one-time anonymous survey, consisting of six sections: (a) background information, (b) degree endorsement, recognition, and accreditation, (c) course structure, (d) placements, (e) module topics, and (f) further information. Frequency analysis was employed for fixed-response questions and thematic analysis for open-ended questions. Participants valued S&C associations and their role in providing degree endorsements, recognitions, and accreditations as they demonstrate quality assurance and alignment with industry standards. However, they felt that professional qualifications from these associations should be more integrated into degree programmes. Regarding degree content and structure, participants agreed that undergraduate degrees should focus on foundational knowledge (e.g., physiology), while postgraduate degrees should cover specialised S&C content and applied practice (e.g., placements). However, some differences in opinion were observed concerning module topics, with participants lacking interest in research-based modules, despite being common, especially at postgraduate level. Placements were considered very important for gaining authentic practical experience, with most participants recommending they be compulsory. Although, flexibility was recommended for students with existing industry experience. These findings provide valuable and needed insights into current perceptions of UK S&C degrees, which may inform stakeholders decisions and practices, lead to closer alignment between stakeholder groups, and create beneficial changes for UK S&C degrees.

Publication Details

Journal
Leeds Beckett Repository (Leeds Beckett University)
Published
2025-08-11
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stakeholders’ Perceptions of Undergraduate and Postgraduate Strength and Conditioning Education in the United Kingdom: A Survey Study

Leeds Beckett Repository (Leeds Beckett University)
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

Stakeholders’ Perceptions of Undergraduate and Postgraduate Strength and Conditioning Education in the United Kingdom: A Survey Study

article en

Abstract

The number of strength and conditioning (S&C) degrees in the United Kingdom has grown alongside the discipline's popularity. The design and development of these degrees are influenced by various stakeholders, including S&C association representatives, potential employers, degree representatives, students, and graduates. Prior to this study, the collective perceptions of these stakeholders regarding UK S&C degrees had not been researched. This study filled this gap by reporting on the results of 73 participants who completed a one-time anonymous survey, consisting of six sections: (a) background information, (b) degree endorsement, recognition, and accreditation, (c) course structure, (d) placements, (e) module topics, and (f) further information. Frequency analysis was employed for fixed-response questions and thematic analysis for open-ended questions. Participants valued S&C associations and their role in providing degree endorsements, recognitions, and accreditations as they demonstrate quality assurance and alignment with industry standards. However, they felt that professional qualifications from these associations should be more integrated into degree programmes. Regarding degree content and structure, participants agreed that undergraduate degrees should focus on foundational knowledge (e.g., physiology), while postgraduate degrees should cover specialised S&C content and applied practice (e.g., placements). However, some differences in opinion were observed concerning module topics, with participants lacking interest in research-based modules, despite being common, especially at postgraduate level. Placements were considered very important for gaining authentic practical experience, with most participants recommending they be compulsory. Although, flexibility was recommended for students with existing industry experience. These findings provide valuable and needed insights into current perceptions of UK S&C degrees, which may inform stakeholders decisions and practices, lead to closer alignment between stakeholder groups, and create beneficial changes for UK S&C degrees.

Leeds Beckett Repository (Leeds Beckett University)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.