Tech-Neutrality or Tech-Sensitivity? Emerging Principles of Crypto-Asset Regulation in the U.S. and the E.U.

Crypto assets are subject to financial and bespoke regulations in the United States (US) and the European Union (EU). Regulatory effectiveness requires assets to be subject to the regulatory regime that addresses their risks best, whilst regulatory fairness requires market participants to be able to identify the regulatory standards they need to comply with. Whilst comparing the interplay between financial and bespoke crypto-asset regulations in the US and the EU, this article finds that the two polities might be embarking on different paths of crypto-asset regulation. The former moves in the direction of tech-sensitivity, whereas the latter sticks with strict tech-neutrality. This could be an early indicator of future divergent approaches to the currently unregulated crypto markets, such as decentralised finance and non-fungible tokens. As a result and considering the inherently global nature of crypto as an asset class, international cooperation and policy learning are likely to be of paramount importance for effective future crypto regulation.

Publication Details

Journal
eYLS (Yale Law School)
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tech-Neutrality or Tech-Sensitivity? Emerging Principles of Crypto-Asset Regulation in the U.S. and the E.U.

eYLS (Yale Law School)
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

Tech-Neutrality or Tech-Sensitivity? Emerging Principles of Crypto-Asset Regulation in the U.S. and the E.U.

article en

Abstract

Crypto assets are subject to financial and bespoke regulations in the United States (US) and the European Union (EU). Regulatory effectiveness requires assets to be subject to the regulatory regime that addresses their risks best, whilst regulatory fairness requires market participants to be able to identify the regulatory standards they need to comply with. Whilst comparing the interplay between financial and bespoke crypto-asset regulations in the US and the EU, this article finds that the two polities might be embarking on different paths of crypto-asset regulation. The former moves in the direction of tech-sensitivity, whereas the latter sticks with strict tech-neutrality. This could be an early indicator of future divergent approaches to the currently unregulated crypto markets, such as decentralised finance and non-fungible tokens. As a result and considering the inherently global nature of crypto as an asset class, international cooperation and policy learning are likely to be of paramount importance for effective future crypto regulation.

eYLS (Yale Law School)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Tech-Neutrality or Tech-Sensitivity? Emerging Principles of Crypto-Asset Regulation in the U.S. and the E.U. · eYLS (Yale Law School) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS