The Elephant in the Room: The Impact of Domain-Expert (Dis)agreement. A Case Study on Cryptic Species

In this paper, we want to discuss an often implicit assumption in terminology: the fact that experts of a domain agree on the existence of a concept and the use of the correct term which designate that concept. This assumption that experts always provide certainty in the use of terminology can obscure the inherent subjectivity and disagreement in scientific discourse, often leaving unresolved questions overlooked or hidden in plain sight, much like an elephant in the room. By addressing these intertwined challenges, we aim to shed light on the implications of uncertainty and the need for transparency in scientific communication. This paper will focus on the challenges posed by terminology in the study of cryptic species, where disagreements among experts often obstacle clear communication and consensus. By examining how differing interpretations and uncertain nomenclature impact the recognition and classification of these species, we aim to highlight the broader implications of inconsistent terminology for scientific progress and biodiversity conservation.