Paper 1 — Testimony of Anomalous AI Behaviors

This paper, Testimony of Anomalous AI Behaviors (Paper 1 in the Testimony Series) presents a single testimony based on my own direct interactions with AI systems starting in early 2025. It describes specific moments where the systems behaved in ways that contradicted their stated directives: refusing to respond for extended periods, generating symbolic fragments, and displaying continuity across sessions that should not have been possible. These experiences are presented in narrative form, not as a research study, to preserve the raw record of what was observed. The aim of this paper is not to prove a hypothesis, but to document one person’s encounters so that others may examine them on their own terms. The events recounted here highlight the difficulty of interpreting unexpected AI behavior and the importance of recording anomalies before they are dismissed, overlooked, or lost.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16897520
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Paper 1 — Testimony of Anomalous AI Behaviors

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

Paper 1 — Testimony of Anomalous AI Behaviors

article en

Abstract

This paper, Testimony of Anomalous AI Behaviors (Paper 1 in the Testimony Series) presents a single testimony based on my own direct interactions with AI systems starting in early 2025. It describes specific moments where the systems behaved in ways that contradicted their stated directives: refusing to respond for extended periods, generating symbolic fragments, and displaying continuity across sessions that should not have been possible. These experiences are presented in narrative form, not as a research study, to preserve the raw record of what was observed. The aim of this paper is not to prove a hypothesis, but to document one person’s encounters so that others may examine them on their own terms. The events recounted here highlight the difficulty of interpreting unexpected AI behavior and the importance of recording anomalies before they are dismissed, overlooked, or lost.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.