Model checking for trustworthy reasoning in autonomous driving

This thesis proposes model checking for trustworthy reasoning in autonomous driving. We combine closed-loop input control and model checking to plan sequences of closed loop controllers for obstacle avoidance in real-time—the former for its superior reactivity to immediate stimuli, and the latter for its strength in modal reasoning. In addition, as both closed-loop control and model checking are transparent, decisions can in principle be explained. To demonstrate our approach, we implement a bespoke model checker on low powered autonomous robot, an additional measure to further promote resource efficient planning. We conduct two case studies. In the first we focus simply on avoiding obstacles to investigate whether using model checking for real-time planning and obstacle avoidance is reliable on our platform. In the second we extend our approach to support goal-directed obstacle avoidance an again characterise its reliability. We show that it is possible to use model checking to develop an approach to real-time obstacle avoidance which is light on resources, transparent, and suitable for online decision-making.

Publication Details

Journal
Enlighten: Theses (The University of Glasgow)
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5525/gla.thesis.85397
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Model checking for trustworthy reasoning in autonomous driving

Enlighten: Theses (The University of Glasgow)
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

Model checking for trustworthy reasoning in autonomous driving

article en

Abstract

This thesis proposes model checking for trustworthy reasoning in autonomous driving. We combine closed-loop input control and model checking to plan sequences of closed loop controllers for obstacle avoidance in real-time—the former for its superior reactivity to immediate stimuli, and the latter for its strength in modal reasoning. In addition, as both closed-loop control and model checking are transparent, decisions can in principle be explained. To demonstrate our approach, we implement a bespoke model checker on low powered autonomous robot, an additional measure to further promote resource efficient planning. We conduct two case studies. In the first we focus simply on avoiding obstacles to investigate whether using model checking for real-time planning and obstacle avoidance is reliable on our platform. In the second we extend our approach to support goal-directed obstacle avoidance an again characterise its reliability. We show that it is possible to use model checking to develop an approach to real-time obstacle avoidance which is light on resources, transparent, and suitable for online decision-making.

Enlighten: Theses (The University of Glasgow)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Model checking for trustworthy reasoning in autonomous driving · Enlighten: Theses (The University of Glasgow) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS