Negotiating Critical Tensions: Creating an Online Resource on Vaccine Hesitancy for Healthcare Professionals

Vaccine hesitancy is regarded as a priority for public health and has a long history of social science research. As part of a qualitative project on childhood vaccine hesitancy, a team of social scientists translated their empirical findings into an online resource (known as a Reusable Learning Object-RLO) aimed at healthcare professionals. The aim of this article is to identify the primary tensions we experienced in creating the RLO. As social scientists, firstly we were torn by clinicians' requests for instruction/answers, versus our preference of providing opportunities for reflection. Secondly, between the RLO-specific convention of assertion versus our professional norms of providing evidence via referencing; and finally, by our tendency as academics to focus on textual aspects, versus the need to consider visual and multimedia conventions within the design of the RLO. By sharing these reflections, we hope to help other sociologists to navigate their own creative interdisciplinary projects and conclude by observing that our processes were themselves inherently reflexive.

Publication Details

Journal
Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham)
Published
2025-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/1360780425135113
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Negotiating Critical Tensions: Creating an Online Resource on Vaccine Hesitancy for Healthcare Professionals

Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham)
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

Negotiating Critical Tensions: Creating an Online Resource on Vaccine Hesitancy for Healthcare Professionals

article en

Abstract

Vaccine hesitancy is regarded as a priority for public health and has a long history of social science research. As part of a qualitative project on childhood vaccine hesitancy, a team of social scientists translated their empirical findings into an online resource (known as a Reusable Learning Object-RLO) aimed at healthcare professionals. The aim of this article is to identify the primary tensions we experienced in creating the RLO. As social scientists, firstly we were torn by clinicians' requests for instruction/answers, versus our preference of providing opportunities for reflection. Secondly, between the RLO-specific convention of assertion versus our professional norms of providing evidence via referencing; and finally, by our tendency as academics to focus on textual aspects, versus the need to consider visual and multimedia conventions within the design of the RLO. By sharing these reflections, we hope to help other sociologists to navigate their own creative interdisciplinary projects and conclude by observing that our processes were themselves inherently reflexive.

Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.