Systemic hierarchy within academic disciplines: How resource capital and social capital stratify academics and form the basis of disciplinary group-based inequality

In the present work, we approach academic disciplines as social systems. We suggest group-based hierarchy exists within the social system of academic disciplines as a function of resource and social capital. We review evidence that both resources and disciplinary social capital can operate independent of societal identity to produce group-based disparities within academic disciplines. Utilizing this new means of classifying groups, we argue that these two factors position a small number of people to be advantaged (i.e., an elite) and most people to be disadvantaged (i.e., the periphery) within most disciplines. We then illustrate how our framework provides an alternative way to understand issues facing academic disciplines. Finally, we conclude with recommendations for reducing group-based inequality as a function of resources and disciplinary social capital.

Publication Details

Journal
Psychology Archives
Published
2025-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.21121
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Systemic hierarchy within academic disciplines: How resource capital and social capital stratify academics and form the basis of disciplinary group-based inequality

Psychology Archives
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

Systemic hierarchy within academic disciplines: How resource capital and social capital stratify academics and form the basis of disciplinary group-based inequality

article en

Abstract

In the present work, we approach academic disciplines as social systems. We suggest group-based hierarchy exists within the social system of academic disciplines as a function of resource and social capital. We review evidence that both resources and disciplinary social capital can operate independent of societal identity to produce group-based disparities within academic disciplines. Utilizing this new means of classifying groups, we argue that these two factors position a small number of people to be advantaged (i.e., an elite) and most people to be disadvantaged (i.e., the periphery) within most disciplines. We then illustrate how our framework provides an alternative way to understand issues facing academic disciplines. Finally, we conclude with recommendations for reducing group-based inequality as a function of resources and disciplinary social capital.

Psychology Archives
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Systemic hierarchy within academic disciplines: How resource capital and social capital stratify academics and form the basis of disciplinary group-based inequality · Psychology Archives (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS