Important deficiencies : A history of juvenile detention in post-war Victoria

The Australian state of Victoria’s juvenile detention system has been the subject of political dispute in every decade since the Second World War. The thesis reveals this essentially continuous dispute as being a function of systemic problems in juvenile detention – many of which resonate with similar systems in other parts of the world – and of bipartisan politics, which has seemingly been unable to resolve these problems. Beginning in 1945, young people in detention gradually became the responsibility of government instead of the philanthropic sector. Since then, rival political parties have alternated between critical advocacy for detained young people and defensive management of the system, depending on which party was in power. This oscillation was maintained until at least the year 2000, irrespective of changes in governmental control, economic policy or the political concerns of the time. The rhetoric of urgent change was never substantially followed through once a party achieved government. The favoured method of defense by governments was to implement a public inquiry from which little reform would ultimately be achieved. This pattern of unending crisis in juvenile detention, and repeated cycles on inquiries, is not unlike the experiences of similar systems in other liberal democracies, including those in the British Isles, North America and New Zealand. The thesis argues that the locus of the problem may be found in the post-war welfare state, with its prevailing views of delinquency, professionalism and class (which obscured the perpetuation of older stereotypes about ‘deserving’ and ‘undeserving’ poor through the use of new ‘expert’ rhetoric), and an unwillingness to spend money on the implicitly ‘undeserving’. With news media interest in and public concern about the latest crisis in the juvenile detention system, governments have once again opted for public inquiries to ‘get to the bottom’ of what is wrong, staying true to an 80-year-long pattern of avoidance.

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Catholic University
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26199/acu.920yw
Primary Topic
Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Important deficiencies : A history of juvenile detention in post-war Victoria

Australian Catholic University
Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies
article

Important deficiencies : A history of juvenile detention in post-war Victoria

article en

Abstract

The Australian state of Victoria’s juvenile detention system has been the subject of political dispute in every decade since the Second World War. The thesis reveals this essentially continuous dispute as being a function of systemic problems in juvenile detention – many of which resonate with similar systems in other parts of the world – and of bipartisan politics, which has seemingly been unable to resolve these problems. Beginning in 1945, young people in detention gradually became the responsibility of government instead of the philanthropic sector. Since then, rival political parties have alternated between critical advocacy for detained young people and defensive management of the system, depending on which party was in power. This oscillation was maintained until at least the year 2000, irrespective of changes in governmental control, economic policy or the political concerns of the time. The rhetoric of urgent change was never substantially followed through once a party achieved government. The favoured method of defense by governments was to implement a public inquiry from which little reform would ultimately be achieved. This pattern of unending crisis in juvenile detention, and repeated cycles on inquiries, is not unlike the experiences of similar systems in other liberal democracies, including those in the British Isles, North America and New Zealand. The thesis argues that the locus of the problem may be found in the post-war welfare state, with its prevailing views of delinquency, professionalism and class (which obscured the perpetuation of older stereotypes about ‘deserving’ and ‘undeserving’ poor through the use of new ‘expert’ rhetoric), and an unwillingness to spend money on the implicitly ‘undeserving’. With news media interest in and public concern about the latest crisis in the juvenile detention system, governments have once again opted for public inquiries to ‘get to the bottom’ of what is wrong, staying true to an 80-year-long pattern of avoidance.

Australian Catholic University
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.