The Difference of Simple Neural Networks in Testing Penetration Speed

Aiming at the difference of different networks in the penetration problem, the paper starts from the precision, time and so on. Comparison of deep neural networks (DNN), Decision Trees, Ran Dom Forests, XGBoost, and Support vector machine (SVM), shows that different networks are different in predicting the ballistic limit of ball penetration. The test results show that the predictive value of the decision tree is 0.01 higher than that of the depth neural network (DNN), but the use time is much longer than that of DNN. The predictions were 0.05 higher when compared with a deep neural network (DNN) using Random Forests, and the predictions were not evenly distributed but the usage time was much lower. When comparing SVM with DNN, the predicted value is 0.0.9 higher, but the Support vector machine time is much less, and the predicted value distribution is even and curvilinear. The predicted values were found to be 0.09 higher when compared with deep neural network (DNN) using XGBoost, but were much lower with the use of specimens (DNN) and the predicted values were unevenly distributed.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Contemporary Education Frontiers
Published
2025-05-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18063/cef.v3i4.1055
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Difference of Simple Neural Networks in Testing Penetration Speed

1 citations
Contemporary Education Frontiers
Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies
3.13
article

The Difference of Simple Neural Networks in Testing Penetration Speed

article en
1 citations

Abstract

Aiming at the difference of different networks in the penetration problem, the paper starts from the precision, time and so on. Comparison of deep neural networks (DNN), Decision Trees, Ran Dom Forests, XGBoost, and Support vector machine (SVM), shows that different networks are different in predicting the ballistic limit of ball penetration. The test results show that the predictive value of the decision tree is 0.01 higher than that of the depth neural network (DNN), but the use time is much longer than that of DNN. The predictions were 0.05 higher when compared with a deep neural network (DNN) using Random Forests, and the predictions were not evenly distributed but the usage time was much lower. When comparing SVM with DNN, the predicted value is 0.0.9 higher, but the Support vector machine time is much less, and the predicted value distribution is even and curvilinear. The predicted values were found to be 0.09 higher when compared with deep neural network (DNN) using XGBoost, but were much lower with the use of specimens (DNN) and the predicted values were unevenly distributed.

Contemporary Education FrontiersVol. 3(4)
Nanjing University of Science and Technology (CN)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies
3.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.