Consistency of aberrant response behavior: Are misfit persons consistent across two different questionnaires administered at the same time?

Abstract Person-fit statistics are important statistics in the modern test theory, which are used to identify respondents with aberrant response behaviors, where, based on statistical evidence, classified as misfit persons. This study aims to determine whether misfit persons are consistent across two different questionnaires that administered simultaneously. The respondents in this study were 723 students in Indonesia. Respondents completed two instruments, namely the 24-item Metacognitive Skills Assessment in Research-Proposal Writing (MSARPW) and the 10-item Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES), where the MSARPW was administered in the same Google Form as the RSES. Both instruments were analyzed using the Multidimensional Partial Credit Model (MPCM). The MPCM produced two person fit statistics, which were the focus of this research, namely person Outfit z and Zh statistics. The results of the regression analysis show that the regression coefficients between Zh MSARPW and Zh RSES are 0.375 (p < .001) and 0.424 (p < .001) for Person Outfit z MSARPW and RSES, respectively. To conclude, with a significant regression coefficient, this finding shows that misfit persons in responding to the MSARPW tend to be misfit persons in responding to the RSES, which indicates that the misfit persons are consistent between different measuring instruments administered at the same administration time. Limitations and implications for future research were also noted.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Romanian Journal of Applied Psychology
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2478/rjap-2025-0006
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Theoretical and Computational Physics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.26

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Consistency of aberrant response behavior: Are misfit persons consistent across two different questionnaires administered at the same time?

1 citations
Romanian Journal of Applied Psychology
Theoretical and Computational Physics
1.26
article

Consistency of aberrant response behavior: Are misfit persons consistent across two different questionnaires administered at the same time?

article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Person-fit statistics are important statistics in the modern test theory, which are used to identify respondents with aberrant response behaviors, where, based on statistical evidence, classified as misfit persons. This study aims to determine whether misfit persons are consistent across two different questionnaires that administered simultaneously. The respondents in this study were 723 students in Indonesia. Respondents completed two instruments, namely the 24-item Metacognitive Skills Assessment in Research-Proposal Writing (MSARPW) and the 10-item Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES), where the MSARPW was administered in the same Google Form as the RSES. Both instruments were analyzed using the Multidimensional Partial Credit Model (MPCM). The MPCM produced two person fit statistics, which were the focus of this research, namely person Outfit z and Zh statistics. The results of the regression analysis show that the regression coefficients between Zh MSARPW and Zh RSES are 0.375 (p < .001) and 0.424 (p < .001) for Person Outfit z MSARPW and RSES, respectively. To conclude, with a significant regression coefficient, this finding shows that misfit persons in responding to the MSARPW tend to be misfit persons in responding to the RSES, which indicates that the misfit persons are consistent between different measuring instruments administered at the same administration time. Limitations and implications for future research were also noted.

Romanian Journal of Applied PsychologyVol. 27(1)
Universitas Gadjah Mada (ID)
Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, Universitas Negeri Jakarta
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Theoretical and Computational Physics
1.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.