A Tight Lower Bound for Doubling Spanners

Any $n$-point set in the $d$-dimensional Euclidean space $\mathbb{R}^d$, for $d = O(1)$, admits a $(1+ε)$-spanner with $\tilde{O}(n \cdot ε^{-d+1})$ edges and lightness $\tilde{O}(ε^{-d})$, for any $ε> 0$. (The {lightness} is a normalized notion of weight, where we divide the spanner weight by the MST weight. The $\tilde{O}$ and $\tildeΩ$ notations hide $\texttt{polylog}(ε^{-1})$ terms.) Moreover, this result is tight: For any $2 \le d = O(1)$, there exists an $n$-point set in $\mathbb{R}^d$, for which any $(1+ε)$-spanner has $\tildeΩ(n \cdot ε^{-d+1})$ edges and lightness $\tildeΩ(n \cdot ε^{-d})$. The upper bounds for Euclidean spanners rely heavily on the spatial property of {cone partitioning} in $\mathbb{R}^d$, which does not seem to extend to the wider family of {doubling metrics}, i.e., metric spaces of constant {doubling dimension}. In doubling metrics, a {simple spanner construction from two decades ago, the {net-tree spanner}}, has $\tilde{O}(n \cdot ε^{-d})$ edges, and it could be transformed into a spanner of lightness $\tilde{O}(n \cdot ε^{-(d+1)})$ by pruning redundant edges. Despite a large body of work, it has remained an open question whether the superior Euclidean bounds of $\tilde{O}(n \cdot ε^{-d+1})$ edges and lightness $\tilde{O}(ε^{-d})$ could be achieved also in doubling metrics. We resolve this question in the negative by presenting a surprisingly simple and tight lower bound, which shows, in particular, that the net-tree spanner and its pruned version are both optimal.

Publication Details

Journal
ArXiv.org
Published
2025-08-15
Primary Topic
Water Quality and Resources Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Tight Lower Bound for Doubling Spanners

ArXiv.org
Water Quality and Resources Studies
article

A Tight Lower Bound for Doubling Spanners

article en

Abstract

Any $n$-point set in the $d$-dimensional Euclidean space $\mathbb{R}^d$, for $d = O(1)$, admits a $(1+ε)$-spanner with $\tilde{O}(n \cdot ε^{-d+1})$ edges and lightness $\tilde{O}(ε^{-d})$, for any $ε> 0$. (The {lightness} is a normalized notion of weight, where we divide the spanner weight by the MST weight. The $\tilde{O}$ and $\tildeΩ$ notations hide $\texttt{polylog}(ε^{-1})$ terms.) Moreover, this result is tight: For any $2 \le d = O(1)$, there exists an $n$-point set in $\mathbb{R}^d$, for which any $(1+ε)$-spanner has $\tildeΩ(n \cdot ε^{-d+1})$ edges and lightness $\tildeΩ(n \cdot ε^{-d})$. The upper bounds for Euclidean spanners rely heavily on the spatial property of {cone partitioning} in $\mathbb{R}^d$, which does not seem to extend to the wider family of {doubling metrics}, i.e., metric spaces of constant {doubling dimension}. In doubling metrics, a {simple spanner construction from two decades ago, the {net-tree spanner}}, has $\tilde{O}(n \cdot ε^{-d})$ edges, and it could be transformed into a spanner of lightness $\tilde{O}(n \cdot ε^{-(d+1)})$ by pruning redundant edges. Despite a large body of work, it has remained an open question whether the superior Euclidean bounds of $\tilde{O}(n \cdot ε^{-d+1})$ edges and lightness $\tilde{O}(ε^{-d})$ could be achieved also in doubling metrics. We resolve this question in the negative by presenting a surprisingly simple and tight lower bound, which shows, in particular, that the net-tree spanner and its pruned version are both optimal.

ArXiv.org
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Water Quality and Resources Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.