A new kind of machines, Riedel-finite-machine cells

This work, already seen by over 2000 people in Engineering/Software & Ifomation Technology groups on LinkedIn, worldwide, within the day, introduces the concept of finite-machine-cells (FMC's): discrete, receptor-based mechanical units whose collective behavior arises not from continuous calculus, but from the threshold dynamics of finite interactions. Each FMC is defined by finite-machine-receptors (FMR's) that can register to-them-specific- thresholds, thermal, mechanical, chemical, or temporal etc. thereby extending the binary 'either/or' logic of Claude E. Shannon or Leibniz formalized binary, the Charles Babbage Computer or Turing Machines in general, into a multi-modal (receptors)logic of finite states. Networks of such cells produce outputs irreducible to the sum of sub-outputs, paralleling, but not derived from, the architecture of biological cells and neurons. The framework originates in the Universal Concept of Finite Repetance (UCFR), a discrete reformation of mathematical foundations, and thereby constitutes an engineering paradigm not reliant on Newtonian continuity. Whereas current machines are monolithic assemblies of receptorless parts, FMCs embody modularity, locality, and emergent design, enabling machines to operate in domains inaccessible to conventional methods (e.g. extreme planetary environments, non-photovoltaic energy harvesting). The FMC concept suggests that just as biology realized complex function through cellular repetition, technology can realize new architectures by grounding machine logic in finitude rather than continuity. This reframing provides a foundation for machines whose principles are as general as those of biological living (self-asswmbling, self-replicating) systems, yet independent of carbon-based replication. In the future FMC's could get kernels that enable self-assembly and self-replication. Wich blurres the distinction to what life itself is. FMC's have energy losses, are not optimized, and modern technology is more optimized, but conventional mathematics and engineering is missing a huge point that the paper tries to make. FMC's are conceptually the easiest energy harnessing devices (nature itself uses the principle in biological organisms), but it is crucial to understand that FMC's are so easy to produce and mirror finite repetance, that even the losses don't plat a role when the suns iradiation is, for all practical purposes, unlimited source of energy. In engineering optimization maybe the superior tactic, it may almost sound heretical even though it is logical, but the simplest scaling is the superior strategy in a world of finite units. *We remind that UCFR is in the state of personal Hypothesis as no forum wants to peer review it, nor display it, Zenodo is the exception.