A Comparative Clinical Study of Laparoscopic Versus Open Cholecystectomy in The Management of Gall Bladder Disease

Cholelithiasis is a common biliary pathology, with laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) now considered the standard of care. In its early adoption in India, it faced challenges including equipment cost, surgical learning curves and intraoperative complications. Some of these points are relevant even today. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of LC and open cholecystectomy (OC) based on various parameters and also to compare the data with the present day clinical practise. retrospective analysis was conducted on 100 patients (50 LC, 50 OC) undergoing cholecystectomy at a tertiary hospital in Mumbai. Patients were included regardless of comorbidities, with exclusion criteria including choledocholithiasis and gallbladder carcinoma. Cases requiring conversion from LC to OC were noted. Key parameters included postoperative complications, duration of hospital stay, time to oral intake, and cosmesis. Data were statistically analysed using t-tests and a p-values <0.05 were considered significant. The conversion rate from LC to OC was 22%, primarily due to bleeding and technical difficulty. Mean hospital stay was significantly shorter for LC (6.34±4.29 days) vs OC (9.94±4.65 days) (p<0.05). Complications like vomiting, fever and wound infection were lower in the LC group, though not statistically significant. Cosmetic satisfaction was higher in the LC group. Intraoperative complications, notably CBD injury, were more frequent in LC. However, more recent studies showed lower conversion rate and intraoperative complications in LC. The intraoperative risks and complications associated with LC appear to have declined significantly over the period of time due to increased surgical expertise.whereas LC has always showed faster recovery and improved cosmesis. While surgical expertise significantly influences LC outcomes, making it a preferred option, OC may remain a relevant option in resource-limited settings due to other parameters.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-08-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16889883
Primary Topic
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Clinical Study of Laparoscopic Versus Open Cholecystectomy in The Management of Gall Bladder Disease

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
article

A Comparative Clinical Study of Laparoscopic Versus Open Cholecystectomy in The Management of Gall Bladder Disease

article en

Abstract

Cholelithiasis is a common biliary pathology, with laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) now considered the standard of care. In its early adoption in India, it faced challenges including equipment cost, surgical learning curves and intraoperative complications. Some of these points are relevant even today. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of LC and open cholecystectomy (OC) based on various parameters and also to compare the data with the present day clinical practise. retrospective analysis was conducted on 100 patients (50 LC, 50 OC) undergoing cholecystectomy at a tertiary hospital in Mumbai. Patients were included regardless of comorbidities, with exclusion criteria including choledocholithiasis and gallbladder carcinoma. Cases requiring conversion from LC to OC were noted. Key parameters included postoperative complications, duration of hospital stay, time to oral intake, and cosmesis. Data were statistically analysed using t-tests and a p-values <0.05 were considered significant. The conversion rate from LC to OC was 22%, primarily due to bleeding and technical difficulty. Mean hospital stay was significantly shorter for LC (6.34±4.29 days) vs OC (9.94±4.65 days) (p<0.05). Complications like vomiting, fever and wound infection were lower in the LC group, though not statistically significant. Cosmetic satisfaction was higher in the LC group. Intraoperative complications, notably CBD injury, were more frequent in LC. However, more recent studies showed lower conversion rate and intraoperative complications in LC. The intraoperative risks and complications associated with LC appear to have declined significantly over the period of time due to increased surgical expertise.whereas LC has always showed faster recovery and improved cosmesis. While surgical expertise significantly influences LC outcomes, making it a preferred option, OC may remain a relevant option in resource-limited settings due to other parameters.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Comparative Clinical Study of Laparoscopic Versus Open Cholecystectomy in The Management of Gall Bladder Disease · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS