Policy Experiments, Informed Consent, and Democratic Authorization

In a typical clinical trial, researchers are required to obtain participants’ informed consent. But for some policy experiments, it is impracticable to obtain informed consent. As a result, these trials sometimes randomize individuals to interventions without their consent. Some critics allege that these experiments fail to show respect for persons and are therefore unethical. Given that governments are increasingly relying on randomized experiments to determine which policies are evidence-based and cost-effective, it is important to assess this criticism. I argue that policy experiments conducted by democratically authorized actors, most notably, democratic governments and their respective institutions, show respect for persons despite not obtaining informed consent.

Publication Details

Journal
PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation)
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Policy Experiments, Informed Consent, and Democratic Authorization

PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation)
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
article

Policy Experiments, Informed Consent, and Democratic Authorization

article en

Abstract

In a typical clinical trial, researchers are required to obtain participants’ informed consent. But for some policy experiments, it is impracticable to obtain informed consent. As a result, these trials sometimes randomize individuals to interventions without their consent. Some critics allege that these experiments fail to show respect for persons and are therefore unethical. Given that governments are increasingly relying on randomized experiments to determine which policies are evidence-based and cost-effective, it is important to assess this criticism. I argue that policy experiments conducted by democratically authorized actors, most notably, democratic governments and their respective institutions, show respect for persons despite not obtaining informed consent.

PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation)
National Institutes of Health
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Policy Experiments, Informed Consent, and Democratic Authorization · PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS