Application and validation of semiautomatic quantification of immunohistochemically stained sections for low cellular tissue such as intervertebral disc using QuPath

Background Immunohistochemistry (IHC) is a widely used method for localizing and semi-quantifying proteins in tissue samples. Traditional IHC analysis often relies on manually counting 200 cells within a designated area, a time-intensive and subjective process that can compromise reproducibility and accuracy. Advances in digital scanning and bioimage analysis tools, such as the open-source software QuPath, enable semi-automated cell counting, reducing subjectivity and increasing efficiency. Aims This project developed a QuPath-based script and detailed guide for semi-automatic cell counting, specifically for tissues with low cellularity, such as intervertebral discs and cartilage. Methods and Results The methodology was validated by demonstrating no significant differences between the manual counting and the semi-automatic quantification (p = 0.783, p = 0.386) while showing a strong correlation between methods for both collagen type II staining (r = 0.9602, p < 0.0001) and N-cadherin staining (r = 0.9044, p = 0.0001). Furthermore, a strong correlation (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) single raters = 0.853) between 3 individual raters with varying academic ranks and experiences in IHC analysis was shown using the semi-automatic quantification method. Discusssion The approach ensures high reproducibility and accuracy, with reduced variability between raters and laboratories. This semi-automated method is particularly suited for tissues with a high extracellular matrix to cell ratio and low cellularity. By minimizing subjectivity and evaluation time, it provides a robust alternative to manual counting, making it ideal for applications where reproducibility and standardization are critical. While the methodology was effective in low-cellularity tissues, its application in other tissue types warrants further exploration. Conclusions These findings underscore the potential of QuPath to streamline IHC analysis and enhance inter-laboratory comparability.

Publication Details

Journal
White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York)
Published
2025-03-01
Primary Topic
Data Analysis with R
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Application and validation of semiautomatic quantification of immunohistochemically stained sections for low cellular tissue such as intervertebral disc using QuPath

White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York)
Data Analysis with R
article

Application and validation of semiautomatic quantification of immunohistochemically stained sections for low cellular tissue such as intervertebral disc using QuPath

article en

Abstract

Background Immunohistochemistry (IHC) is a widely used method for localizing and semi-quantifying proteins in tissue samples. Traditional IHC analysis often relies on manually counting 200 cells within a designated area, a time-intensive and subjective process that can compromise reproducibility and accuracy. Advances in digital scanning and bioimage analysis tools, such as the open-source software QuPath, enable semi-automated cell counting, reducing subjectivity and increasing efficiency. Aims This project developed a QuPath-based script and detailed guide for semi-automatic cell counting, specifically for tissues with low cellularity, such as intervertebral discs and cartilage. Methods and Results The methodology was validated by demonstrating no significant differences between the manual counting and the semi-automatic quantification (p = 0.783, p = 0.386) while showing a strong correlation between methods for both collagen type II staining (r = 0.9602, p < 0.0001) and N-cadherin staining (r = 0.9044, p = 0.0001). Furthermore, a strong correlation (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) single raters = 0.853) between 3 individual raters with varying academic ranks and experiences in IHC analysis was shown using the semi-automatic quantification method. Discusssion The approach ensures high reproducibility and accuracy, with reduced variability between raters and laboratories. This semi-automated method is particularly suited for tissues with a high extracellular matrix to cell ratio and low cellularity. By minimizing subjectivity and evaluation time, it provides a robust alternative to manual counting, making it ideal for applications where reproducibility and standardization are critical. While the methodology was effective in low-cellularity tissues, its application in other tissue types warrants further exploration. Conclusions These findings underscore the potential of QuPath to streamline IHC analysis and enhance inter-laboratory comparability.

White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Data Analysis with R
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.