Tracking the long-term timing accuracy of the X-Ray Telescope on board the <i>Neil Gehrels Swift</i> Observatory

Context. The Neil Gehrels Swift Observatory has been operational since November 2004. Its X-ray Telescope (XRT), operating in the 0.3–10.0 keV range, is designed to provide detailed position, timing, and spectroscopic information. Aims. The calibration procedure for assessing the absolute timing accuracy of XRT was described in a previous paper. Here we update the past analysis using the complete data set of the Crab pulsar observations up to October 2022 and using a new version of the data-processing software package that includes corrections to several issues that could have affected the previous results. Methods. We evaluate the accuracy of the Crab pulse period determination using the folding technique and the pulse-phase analysis and compare our results with the values derived from radio observations. We also check the absolute time reconstruction, measuring the phase position of the main peak in the Crab profile and comparing it with the value reported in the literature, which is based on Rossi X-Ray Timing Explorer (RXTE) observations. Results. We find that the accuracy in period determination for the Crab pulsar is of the order of a few picoseconds for the observations with the largest data time span. The absolute time reconstruction, measured using the position of the main pulse peak, shows that the main peak precedes the phase of the position reported in the literature for RXTE by ~263 µs on average. This corresponds to 0.982 in phase, with an observed dispersion of ±0.02 in phase values. We also find that observations very close in time (down to ~1 day separation) show a significant variation in absolute phase.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-03-07
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tracking the long-term timing accuracy of the X-Ray Telescope on board the Neil Gehrels Swift Observatory

Figshare
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

Tracking the long-term timing accuracy of the X-Ray Telescope on board the Neil Gehrels Swift Observatory

article en

Abstract

Context. The Neil Gehrels Swift Observatory has been operational since November 2004. Its X-ray Telescope (XRT), operating in the 0.3–10.0 keV range, is designed to provide detailed position, timing, and spectroscopic information. Aims. The calibration procedure for assessing the absolute timing accuracy of XRT was described in a previous paper. Here we update the past analysis using the complete data set of the Crab pulsar observations up to October 2022 and using a new version of the data-processing software package that includes corrections to several issues that could have affected the previous results. Methods. We evaluate the accuracy of the Crab pulse period determination using the folding technique and the pulse-phase analysis and compare our results with the values derived from radio observations. We also check the absolute time reconstruction, measuring the phase position of the main peak in the Crab profile and comparing it with the value reported in the literature, which is based on Rossi X-Ray Timing Explorer (RXTE) observations. Results. We find that the accuracy in period determination for the Crab pulsar is of the order of a few picoseconds for the observations with the largest data time span. The absolute time reconstruction, measured using the position of the main pulse peak, shows that the main peak precedes the phase of the position reported in the literature for RXTE by ~263 µs on average. This corresponds to 0.982 in phase, with an observed dispersion of ±0.02 in phase values. We also find that observations very close in time (down to ~1 day separation) show a significant variation in absolute phase.

Figshare
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.