Sex and Common Germline Variants Affect the Toxicity Profile and Pharmacokinetics of Alectinib: A Nationwide Cohort Study in Patients With ALK-Positive NSCLC
Introduction: Alectinib, a small-molecule kinase inhibitor, is used as first-line treatment for ALK-positive (ALK+) NSCLC. Albeit generally well-tolerated, a considerable subset of patients requires dose adjustments due to drug-related toxicity. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms in genes related to the metabolism of alectinib may upfront identify patients at risk for toxicity. Methods: In this multicenter observational cohort study in patients with advanced ALK+ NSCLC receiving alectinib treatment, we investigated the association between toxicity, pharmacokinetics, and key genetic variants in ABCB1, CYP3A4, PPAR-α, POR, and CYP3A5. Data on demographics, adverse events, and alectinib trough levels were collected from five hospitals. Results: Among 215 patients, 47% experienced severe toxicity. Women experienced more severe toxicity (female versus male: 56% versus 34%; p = 0.001) and had +35% higher alectinib trough levels (p < 0.001). Homozygous carriers of the PPAR-α 209G>A variant exhibited a higher incidence of grade greater than or equal to 3 toxicity (38%) compared with patients who carried at least one wild-type allele (11%) (p = 0.004). This remained significant after Bonferroni correction. Patients who experienced severe toxicity had +18.5% (95% confidence interval: 2.9%–36.6%; p = 0.019) higher trough levels. Conclusions: Female patients encounter more severe toxicity due to higher alectinib exposure, which warrants further exploration. PPAR-α 209G>A significantly increased relevant alectinib-induced toxicity, most likely due to an increase in alectinib exposure. Pretreatment testing for genetic variants with a subsequent dose reduction could provide a viable approach to reduce alectinib-related toxicity.
Publication Details
- Journal
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University)
- Published
- 2025-04-01
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 3.13