Education and policy borrowing in the Arabian Gulf: technical and vocational education and training in Saudi Arabia

While policy borrowing in education is a common practice globally, this paper illustrates the problematic nature of drawing on international experts to reform and develop education policy in Saudi Arabia. While the reliance on consultants was initially driven by a lack of expertise in education policymaking, the impetus to compete globally has led to a focus on “international best practices” rather than policies that are informed by the needs of the local context. Changes to the technical and vocational education and training (TVET) agenda illustrate how reforms based on successful policies in other economies have fallen short in addressing the education and work aspirations of young people within Saudi Arabia. Drawing on qualitative data collected from 152 participants in secondary school as well as vocational colleges, this paper illustrates that despite the education policy rhetoric that positions TVET as a flexible and desirable educational pathway for young people, on the ground policies and reforms do not address the broader challenges within the education system that influence how TVET is perceived and experienced. The paper highlights the importance of incorporating young people’s perspectives to contextualise policies so that they benefit intended recipients.

Publication Details

Journal
London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)
Published
2025-05-07
Primary Topic
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Education and policy borrowing in the Arabian Gulf: technical and vocational education and training in Saudi Arabia

London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
article

Education and policy borrowing in the Arabian Gulf: technical and vocational education and training in Saudi Arabia

article en

Abstract

While policy borrowing in education is a common practice globally, this paper illustrates the problematic nature of drawing on international experts to reform and develop education policy in Saudi Arabia. While the reliance on consultants was initially driven by a lack of expertise in education policymaking, the impetus to compete globally has led to a focus on “international best practices” rather than policies that are informed by the needs of the local context. Changes to the technical and vocational education and training (TVET) agenda illustrate how reforms based on successful policies in other economies have fallen short in addressing the education and work aspirations of young people within Saudi Arabia. Drawing on qualitative data collected from 152 participants in secondary school as well as vocational colleges, this paper illustrates that despite the education policy rhetoric that positions TVET as a flexible and desirable educational pathway for young people, on the ground policies and reforms do not address the broader challenges within the education system that influence how TVET is perceived and experienced. The paper highlights the importance of incorporating young people’s perspectives to contextualise policies so that they benefit intended recipients.

London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.