An opportunistic observational study of hospital switchboard hold messages, hold music and time spent waiting.

Numerous callers contact hospital switchboards, many repeatedly. Recorded switchboard messages have broad reach. We sampled outgoing calls from our regional infectious diseases service to other hospital switchboards over a 3-month period. Wait times varied substantially. Two calls were cut off unanswered. Recorded messages commonly covered infection control precautions for visitors, visiting rules, and guidance regarding calling for medical advice. At least one message was out of date. Another advised unwell people not to visit the hospital. We followed up our sample with freedom of information requests, focusing on call volume data and policies regarding switchboard systems and messaging. Many policies were informal. Overall, the user experience varied substantially between hospitals. Messaging policies appeared to have little regard to messages' relevance, utility and impact. Calling a hospital switchboard is a common, non-biomedical task that would benefit from substantial effort to establish and promote best practice.

Publication Details

Journal
Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Published
2025-03-01
Primary Topic
Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An opportunistic observational study of hospital switchboard hold messages, hold music and time spent waiting.

Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies
article

An opportunistic observational study of hospital switchboard hold messages, hold music and time spent waiting.

article en

Abstract

Numerous callers contact hospital switchboards, many repeatedly. Recorded switchboard messages have broad reach. We sampled outgoing calls from our regional infectious diseases service to other hospital switchboards over a 3-month period. Wait times varied substantially. Two calls were cut off unanswered. Recorded messages commonly covered infection control precautions for visitors, visiting rules, and guidance regarding calling for medical advice. At least one message was out of date. Another advised unwell people not to visit the hospital. We followed up our sample with freedom of information requests, focusing on call volume data and policies regarding switchboard systems and messaging. Many policies were informal. Overall, the user experience varied substantially between hospitals. Messaging policies appeared to have little regard to messages' relevance, utility and impact. Calling a hospital switchboard is a common, non-biomedical task that would benefit from substantial effort to establish and promote best practice.

Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

An opportunistic observational study of hospital switchboard hold messages, hold music and time spent waiting. · Apollo (University of Cambridge) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS