We Cease to Be Mere Fragments:Justice, Alienation, Liberalism and Socialism

What is the relationship between liberalism and socialism? Partisans of each political tradition often focus on the shortcomings of the other, with socialists charging liberals with defending merely formal ideas of freedom, which lead them to a naïve defence of the status quo, while liberals often view socialists as excessively utopian, and as blind to the ways in which collective forms of economic organisation can lead to oppression. This article examines the prospects for a more eirenic understanding of the relationship between liberalism and socialism, by means of examining the significance of the main points of contention between canonical representatives of each tradition, Rawls and Marx. By examining questions relating to the limits of liberal rights, the problems of alienation and self-realisation in work, the place of distributive principles in socialist views, and the possibility of a society beyond justice, the article defends a partial reconciliation between these two traditions.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York)
Published
2025-05-17
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

We Cease to Be Mere Fragments:Justice, Alienation, Liberalism and Socialism

White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York)
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

We Cease to Be Mere Fragments:Justice, Alienation, Liberalism and Socialism

article en

Abstract

What is the relationship between liberalism and socialism? Partisans of each political tradition often focus on the shortcomings of the other, with socialists charging liberals with defending merely formal ideas of freedom, which lead them to a naïve defence of the status quo, while liberals often view socialists as excessively utopian, and as blind to the ways in which collective forms of economic organisation can lead to oppression. This article examines the prospects for a more eirenic understanding of the relationship between liberalism and socialism, by means of examining the significance of the main points of contention between canonical representatives of each tradition, Rawls and Marx. By examining questions relating to the limits of liberal rights, the problems of alienation and self-realisation in work, the place of distributive principles in socialist views, and the possibility of a society beyond justice, the article defends a partial reconciliation between these two traditions.

White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York)
University of York (GB)
Sapienza Università di Roma
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.