What Indirect Affirmative Action Can Do

Affirmative action is under pressure in the United States. At the moment, affirmative action is both legally prohibited and politically ill advised. For an egalitarian, this is not good news. What to do? This paper aims to show that indirect affirmative action can be useful for the egalitarian. It does so in two steps. First, it explains what indirect affirmative action is. Providing a paradigm-based definition, it argues that an intention to disproportionately benefit a minority is not a necessary, but a paradigmatic, condition of indirect affirmative action. Second, it shows that (i) indirect affirmative action survives prominent objections to affirmative action, (ii) reasons of equality of opportunity and integration give us reason to pursue indirect affirmative action, and (iii) in a politically inegalitarian climate like the current one in the US, indirect affirmative action is particularly strategically useful vis-á-vis direct affirmative action for the egalitarian, and it provides a preliminary case for why it is sometimes permissible to pursue indirect affirmative action as a form of egalitarian gamesmanship.

Publication Details

Journal
PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation)
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Theoretical and Computational Physics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What Indirect Affirmative Action Can Do

PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation)
Theoretical and Computational Physics
article

What Indirect Affirmative Action Can Do

article en

Abstract

Affirmative action is under pressure in the United States. At the moment, affirmative action is both legally prohibited and politically ill advised. For an egalitarian, this is not good news. What to do? This paper aims to show that indirect affirmative action can be useful for the egalitarian. It does so in two steps. First, it explains what indirect affirmative action is. Providing a paradigm-based definition, it argues that an intention to disproportionately benefit a minority is not a necessary, but a paradigmatic, condition of indirect affirmative action. Second, it shows that (i) indirect affirmative action survives prominent objections to affirmative action, (ii) reasons of equality of opportunity and integration give us reason to pursue indirect affirmative action, and (iii) in a politically inegalitarian climate like the current one in the US, indirect affirmative action is particularly strategically useful vis-á-vis direct affirmative action for the egalitarian, and it provides a preliminary case for why it is sometimes permissible to pursue indirect affirmative action as a form of egalitarian gamesmanship.

PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation)
National Research Foundation, Danmarks Grundforskningsfond
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Theoretical and Computational Physics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.