Förbättrad hållbarhetsrapportering i energidistributionssektor : i linje med CSRD:s krav på klimatförändringar, biologisk mångfald och cirkulär ekonomi

This study examines how large energy companies (LEC) in Sweden can better support their real estate and industrial customers in aligning with the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), by improving the provision of sustainability data related to climate change, biodiversity, and circular economy. Through a qualitative case-study approach combining the methods data analysis, and semi-structured interviews, the study focuses on the information needs of real estate customers using district heating and industrial customers using electricity distribution. The study was conducted in collaboration with the energy company E.ON. Findings indicate a clear imbalance in how companies report on the three environmental areas outlined in the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS). Climate change related disclosures (E1) are comparatively well developed and often supported by measurable indicators and internal targets. In contrast, biodiversity (E4) and circular economy (E5) receive less attention and are typically reported in broad, qualitative terms. This disparity appears to be linked to limited knowledge about the actual environmental impacts in these areas, as well as a lack of internal expertise, clear responsibilities, and standardized metrics. Companies also tend to prioritize topics that are easier to quantify and perceived more commonly expected by external stakeholders. Underreporting of areas like biodiversity and resource flows leads to incomplete information across the value chain, limiting customers’ ability to make informed decisions and weakening sustainability credibility. Since energy systems influence other sectors’ climate transitions, poor visibility of upstream impacts can hinder planning and reduce opportunities for innovation and long-term environmental improvements. Ultimately, the study highlights a need for a more proactive and collaborative approach to sustainability data sharing. To meet both regulatory expectations and broader environmental goals, large energy providers should invest in more integrated data systems, foster clearer communication channels, and work jointly with customers to identify relevant indicators. These improvements will be essential to ensure that sustainability reporting reflects what truly matters, environmentally, strategically, and societally.

Publication Details

Journal
KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Sustainable Industrial Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Förbättrad hållbarhetsrapportering i energidistributionssektor : i linje med CSRD:s krav på klimatförändringar, biologisk mångfald och cirkulär ekonomi

KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)
Sustainable Industrial Ecology
article

Förbättrad hållbarhetsrapportering i energidistributionssektor : i linje med CSRD:s krav på klimatförändringar, biologisk mångfald och cirkulär ekonomi

article en

Abstract

This study examines how large energy companies (LEC) in Sweden can better support their real estate and industrial customers in aligning with the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), by improving the provision of sustainability data related to climate change, biodiversity, and circular economy. Through a qualitative case-study approach combining the methods data analysis, and semi-structured interviews, the study focuses on the information needs of real estate customers using district heating and industrial customers using electricity distribution. The study was conducted in collaboration with the energy company E.ON. Findings indicate a clear imbalance in how companies report on the three environmental areas outlined in the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS). Climate change related disclosures (E1) are comparatively well developed and often supported by measurable indicators and internal targets. In contrast, biodiversity (E4) and circular economy (E5) receive less attention and are typically reported in broad, qualitative terms. This disparity appears to be linked to limited knowledge about the actual environmental impacts in these areas, as well as a lack of internal expertise, clear responsibilities, and standardized metrics. Companies also tend to prioritize topics that are easier to quantify and perceived more commonly expected by external stakeholders. Underreporting of areas like biodiversity and resource flows leads to incomplete information across the value chain, limiting customers’ ability to make informed decisions and weakening sustainability credibility. Since energy systems influence other sectors’ climate transitions, poor visibility of upstream impacts can hinder planning and reduce opportunities for innovation and long-term environmental improvements. Ultimately, the study highlights a need for a more proactive and collaborative approach to sustainability data sharing. To meet both regulatory expectations and broader environmental goals, large energy providers should invest in more integrated data systems, foster clearer communication channels, and work jointly with customers to identify relevant indicators. These improvements will be essential to ensure that sustainability reporting reflects what truly matters, environmentally, strategically, and societally.

KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Sustainable Industrial Ecology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Förbättrad hållbarhetsrapportering i energidistributionssektor : i linje med CSRD:s krav på klimatförändringar, biologisk mångfald och cirkulär ekonomi · KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS