Diagnostic Accuracy of Mean Platelet Volume in Cirrhotic Patients with Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis Presented to the Emergency Department

Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of mean platelet volume (MPV) in predicting SBP in cirrhotic patients. Methods: This was an observational, analytical, and retrospective study conducted on cirrhotic patients with abdominal ascites referred to the emergency department (ED) over a 1-year period. The cirrhotic patients with ascites were divided into two groups with or without SBP. The diagnostic accuracy of MPV for detecting SBP was measured and compared with the analysis of the ascites fluid obtained by paracentesis as a gold standard procedure in the absence of any secondary causes of peritonitis. The required data were documented in a checklist. Results: A total of 252 patients, 126 with SBP and 126 without SBP, were included in the study. The mean MPV in these patients was 8.36 ± 0.92 fL. Patients with SBP had a significantly longer duration of cirrhosis, more severe fever and abdominal pain, and higher ascites WBC and PMN counts and higher mean MPV (p<001). At the most appropriate cut-off point (i.e., 8.3 fL), MPV provided the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and the diagnostic accuracy of 69.84%, 53.97%, 60.27%, 64.15%, and 61.90%, respectively, for the diagnosis of SBP. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve showed that MPV had an acceptable diagnostic accuracy (AUC = 0.677). Conclusion: Mean platelet volume, as a non-invasive, simple, and accessible laboratory parameter, with acceptable diagnostic accuracy in cirrhotic patients with ascites may have a predictive role in the diagnosis of SBP.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-10-01
Primary Topic
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diagnostic Accuracy of Mean Platelet Volume in Cirrhotic Patients with Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis Presented to the Emergency Department

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
article

Diagnostic Accuracy of Mean Platelet Volume in Cirrhotic Patients with Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis Presented to the Emergency Department

article en

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of mean platelet volume (MPV) in predicting SBP in cirrhotic patients. Methods: This was an observational, analytical, and retrospective study conducted on cirrhotic patients with abdominal ascites referred to the emergency department (ED) over a 1-year period. The cirrhotic patients with ascites were divided into two groups with or without SBP. The diagnostic accuracy of MPV for detecting SBP was measured and compared with the analysis of the ascites fluid obtained by paracentesis as a gold standard procedure in the absence of any secondary causes of peritonitis. The required data were documented in a checklist. Results: A total of 252 patients, 126 with SBP and 126 without SBP, were included in the study. The mean MPV in these patients was 8.36 ± 0.92 fL. Patients with SBP had a significantly longer duration of cirrhosis, more severe fever and abdominal pain, and higher ascites WBC and PMN counts and higher mean MPV (p<001). At the most appropriate cut-off point (i.e., 8.3 fL), MPV provided the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and the diagnostic accuracy of 69.84%, 53.97%, 60.27%, 64.15%, and 61.90%, respectively, for the diagnosis of SBP. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve showed that MPV had an acceptable diagnostic accuracy (AUC = 0.677). Conclusion: Mean platelet volume, as a non-invasive, simple, and accessible laboratory parameter, with acceptable diagnostic accuracy in cirrhotic patients with ascites may have a predictive role in the diagnosis of SBP.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Kerman University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.