Appraisal of current surgical guidelines for inflammatory bowel disease using the AGREE-S instrument: A scoping review

Aim Guidelines play a crucial role in improving patient care by providing clinicians with up to date evidence-based recommendations. A vast number of guidelines exist on the surgical management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The aim of this scoping review was to identify current surgical IBD guidelines, assess their quality and identify areas of variation between the existing guidelines. Method A systematic search of the literature from January 2008 to September 2023 was conducted. After identifying eligible guidelines, they were assessed for quality using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation for Surgical Interventions (AGREE-S) instrument. Data were extracted on descriptive guideline characteristics and recommendations. Results Fifteen guidelines were identified globally. Most guidelines were published between 2011 and 2023, with six focusing solely on Crohn's disease, five on ulcerative colitis and four on both. Six guidelines focused exclusively on surgical management, while nine contained both medical and surgical recommendations. The overall mean AGREE-S score was 59%, with more recent guidelines scoring higher. Conclusions The quality of IBD surgical guidelines varies considerably. High-quality, collaborative, international guidelines are needed to reduce duplication and ensure consistent, evidence-based surgical care for IBD patients worldwide. Future guideline development should adhere to the AGREE-S criteria to enhance methodological rigour and transparency.

Publication Details

Journal
White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York)
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Appraisal of current surgical guidelines for inflammatory bowel disease using the AGREE-S instrument: A scoping review

White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York)
Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies
article

Appraisal of current surgical guidelines for inflammatory bowel disease using the AGREE-S instrument: A scoping review

article en

Abstract

Aim Guidelines play a crucial role in improving patient care by providing clinicians with up to date evidence-based recommendations. A vast number of guidelines exist on the surgical management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The aim of this scoping review was to identify current surgical IBD guidelines, assess their quality and identify areas of variation between the existing guidelines. Method A systematic search of the literature from January 2008 to September 2023 was conducted. After identifying eligible guidelines, they were assessed for quality using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation for Surgical Interventions (AGREE-S) instrument. Data were extracted on descriptive guideline characteristics and recommendations. Results Fifteen guidelines were identified globally. Most guidelines were published between 2011 and 2023, with six focusing solely on Crohn's disease, five on ulcerative colitis and four on both. Six guidelines focused exclusively on surgical management, while nine contained both medical and surgical recommendations. The overall mean AGREE-S score was 59%, with more recent guidelines scoring higher. Conclusions The quality of IBD surgical guidelines varies considerably. High-quality, collaborative, international guidelines are needed to reduce duplication and ensure consistent, evidence-based surgical care for IBD patients worldwide. Future guideline development should adhere to the AGREE-S criteria to enhance methodological rigour and transparency.

White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.