A contest of sentiment analysis: K-nearest neighbor versus neural network

Discourse about public matters often encompasses sentences that address topics emerging within societal contexts, including issues related to Islamophobia. Debates surrounding this subject frequently evoke support and opposition within digital platforms and interpersonal interactions. Categorizing such dialogic expressions within online media facilitates an evaluation of their negative and positive implications. This study employs two distinct methodologies, specifically deep learning and machine learning techniques, to visualize the findings by implementing dual algorithms. According to the comparative analysis, deep learning achieves a higher accuracy rate of 78%, whereas machine learning achieves a rate of 71%. Thus, deep learning is a better method for textual data classification.

Publication Details

Journal
Research Repository Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim (University of Southampton)
Published
2025-04-02
Primary Topic
Cell Image Analysis Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A contest of sentiment analysis: K-nearest neighbor versus neural network

Research Repository Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim (University of Southampton)
Cell Image Analysis Techniques
article

A contest of sentiment analysis: K-nearest neighbor versus neural network

article en

Abstract

Discourse about public matters often encompasses sentences that address topics emerging within societal contexts, including issues related to Islamophobia. Debates surrounding this subject frequently evoke support and opposition within digital platforms and interpersonal interactions. Categorizing such dialogic expressions within online media facilitates an evaluation of their negative and positive implications. This study employs two distinct methodologies, specifically deep learning and machine learning techniques, to visualize the findings by implementing dual algorithms. According to the comparative analysis, deep learning achieves a higher accuracy rate of 78%, whereas machine learning achieves a rate of 71%. Thus, deep learning is a better method for textual data classification.

Research Repository Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim (University of Southampton)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Cell Image Analysis Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A contest of sentiment analysis: K-nearest neighbor versus neural network · Research Repository Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim (University of Southampton) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS