EFL teachers’ feedback practices : A qualitative study of how lower-secondary teachers in Sweden adapt feedback to students’ proficiency levels and learner profiles

This study investigates how two experienced lower-secondary English teachers in Sweden conceive of and use feedback as part of their professional practice, with a particular focus on how such feedback is influenced by students’ individual differences highlighted by Ellis (2012). Data were collected from semi-structured interviews through convenience sampling of two experienced EFL teachers in Sweden. Both manifest and latent analyses were conducted to capture not only how the teachers described their stated feedback practices but also the underlying values implied by their reasoning behind them. The study is theoretically grounded in Lövlie’s Praxis Triangle (1974, in Sundberg, 2022), which highlights the interplay between curriculum interpretation and research/theory-based, practice-based, and ethically based considerations. Findings indicate that feedback is often adapted based on prior knowledge of a student’s proficiency level, with higher-achieving students receiving more detailed, implicit, or challenging feedback, while lower-performing students receive more supportive and simplified guidance. Other individual differences, including personality traits, age, emotional needs, and neurodiversity, also shape feedback practices, though typically in an intuitive rather than systematic manner. Time constraints were found to be a key limiting factor in delivering individualized feedback. This research contributes to a deeper understanding of EFL feedback practices and highlights the importance of reflective, context-sensitive approaches to supporting diverse learners in the classroom.

Publication Details

Journal
DiVA (Linnaeus University)
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Student Assessment and Feedback
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EFL teachers’ feedback practices : A qualitative study of how lower-secondary teachers in Sweden adapt feedback to students’ proficiency levels and learner profiles

DiVA (Linnaeus University)
Student Assessment and Feedback
article

EFL teachers’ feedback practices : A qualitative study of how lower-secondary teachers in Sweden adapt feedback to students’ proficiency levels and learner profiles

article en

Abstract

This study investigates how two experienced lower-secondary English teachers in Sweden conceive of and use feedback as part of their professional practice, with a particular focus on how such feedback is influenced by students’ individual differences highlighted by Ellis (2012). Data were collected from semi-structured interviews through convenience sampling of two experienced EFL teachers in Sweden. Both manifest and latent analyses were conducted to capture not only how the teachers described their stated feedback practices but also the underlying values implied by their reasoning behind them. The study is theoretically grounded in Lövlie’s Praxis Triangle (1974, in Sundberg, 2022), which highlights the interplay between curriculum interpretation and research/theory-based, practice-based, and ethically based considerations. Findings indicate that feedback is often adapted based on prior knowledge of a student’s proficiency level, with higher-achieving students receiving more detailed, implicit, or challenging feedback, while lower-performing students receive more supportive and simplified guidance. Other individual differences, including personality traits, age, emotional needs, and neurodiversity, also shape feedback practices, though typically in an intuitive rather than systematic manner. Time constraints were found to be a key limiting factor in delivering individualized feedback. This research contributes to a deeper understanding of EFL feedback practices and highlights the importance of reflective, context-sensitive approaches to supporting diverse learners in the classroom.

DiVA (Linnaeus University)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Student Assessment and Feedback
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.