Decarbonization strategies for the global cement and concrete industry. Highlighting the role of chemical admixtures for successful transition

The objective of this paper is to present the two main possibilities for reducing the CO2 footprint of cement via clinker substitution using supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) or carbon capture&storage. Engineering properties of mortar prepared from binders holding SCMs indicate that substantial clinker replacement is possible, e.g. using calcined clay or slag. Yet, such comparable properties can only be achieved by applying suitable chemical admixtures (superplasticizers, accelerators, etc.). The second option, carbon capture and storage (CCS), allows us to maintain the current cement production processes, but it is expensive and significantly increases the price for cement. For widespread application of SCMs in cement, novel admixtures are compulsory to facilitate successful transition to low carbon binders. This paper compares both alternatives for CO2 reduction and suggests potential solutions for existing technology gaps.

Publication Details

Journal
Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Decarbonization strategies for the global cement and concrete industry. Highlighting the role of chemical admixtures for successful transition

Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)
Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies
article

Decarbonization strategies for the global cement and concrete industry. Highlighting the role of chemical admixtures for successful transition

article en

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to present the two main possibilities for reducing the CO2 footprint of cement via clinker substitution using supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) or carbon capture&storage. Engineering properties of mortar prepared from binders holding SCMs indicate that substantial clinker replacement is possible, e.g. using calcined clay or slag. Yet, such comparable properties can only be achieved by applying suitable chemical admixtures (superplasticizers, accelerators, etc.). The second option, carbon capture and storage (CCS), allows us to maintain the current cement production processes, but it is expensive and significantly increases the price for cement. For widespread application of SCMs in cement, novel admixtures are compulsory to facilitate successful transition to low carbon binders. This paper compares both alternatives for CO2 reduction and suggests potential solutions for existing technology gaps.

Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.