Feasibility and acceptability of general practitioners using sit–stand desks: a feasibility trial

<h4><b>Objectives</b></h4><p dir="ltr">The primary aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility and acceptability of general practitioners (GPs) using sit–stand desks to facilitate standing during consultations. A further aim was to examine the views of patients about GPs standing for their consultations. <h4><b>Design</b></h4><p dir="ltr">A pre–post single-group experimental trial design. <h4><b>Setting</b></h4><p dir="ltr">General practices in England, UK. <h4><b>Participants</b></h4><p dir="ltr">42 GPs (working a minimum of five clinical sessions per week) and 301 patients (aged ≥18 years). <h4><b>Interventions</b></h4><p dir="ltr">The intervention consisted of each GP having a sit–stand desk (Opløft Sit-Stand Platform) installed in their consultation room for 4 working weeks. Sit–stand desks allow users to switch, in a few seconds, between a sitting and standing position and vice versa, by adjusting the height of the desk. <h4><b>Main outcome measures</b></h4><p dir="ltr">To test feasibility and acceptability, GPs reported their views about using sit–stand desks at work at baseline and follow-up. Sitting time and physical activity were also measured via accelerometer at baseline and follow-up. Patients who attended a consultation where their GP was standing were asked to complete an exit questionnaire about the perceived impact on the consultation. <h4><b>Results</b></h4><p dir="ltr">Most GPs reported using their sit–stand desk daily (n=28, 75.7%). 16 GPs (44.4%) used their sit–stand desk during face-to-face consultations every day. Most GPs and patients did not view that GPs standing during face-to-face consultations impacted the doctor–patient relationship (GPs; 73.5%, patients; 83.7%). GPs’ sitting time during work was 121 min per day lower (95% CI: −165 to −77.58) at follow-up compared with baseline. <h4><b>Conclusions</b></h4><p dir="ltr">Use of sit–stand desks is acceptable within general practice and may reduce sitting time in GPs. This may benefit GPs and help reduce sitting time in patients. <p dir="ltr"><b>Trial registration number: </b>ISRCTN76982860.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-03-11
Primary Topic
Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Feasibility and acceptability of general practitioners using sit–stand desks: a feasibility trial

Figshare
Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
article

Feasibility and acceptability of general practitioners using sit–stand desks: a feasibility trial

article en

Abstract

<h4><b>Objectives</b></h4><p dir="ltr">The primary aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility and acceptability of general practitioners (GPs) using sit–stand desks to facilitate standing during consultations. A further aim was to examine the views of patients about GPs standing for their consultations. <h4><b>Design</b></h4><p dir="ltr">A pre–post single-group experimental trial design. <h4><b>Setting</b></h4><p dir="ltr">General practices in England, UK. <h4><b>Participants</b></h4><p dir="ltr">42 GPs (working a minimum of five clinical sessions per week) and 301 patients (aged ≥18 years). <h4><b>Interventions</b></h4><p dir="ltr">The intervention consisted of each GP having a sit–stand desk (Opløft Sit-Stand Platform) installed in their consultation room for 4 working weeks. Sit–stand desks allow users to switch, in a few seconds, between a sitting and standing position and vice versa, by adjusting the height of the desk. <h4><b>Main outcome measures</b></h4><p dir="ltr">To test feasibility and acceptability, GPs reported their views about using sit–stand desks at work at baseline and follow-up. Sitting time and physical activity were also measured via accelerometer at baseline and follow-up. Patients who attended a consultation where their GP was standing were asked to complete an exit questionnaire about the perceived impact on the consultation. <h4><b>Results</b></h4><p dir="ltr">Most GPs reported using their sit–stand desk daily (n=28, 75.7%). 16 GPs (44.4%) used their sit–stand desk during face-to-face consultations every day. Most GPs and patients did not view that GPs standing during face-to-face consultations impacted the doctor–patient relationship (GPs; 73.5%, patients; 83.7%). GPs’ sitting time during work was 121 min per day lower (95% CI: −165 to −77.58) at follow-up compared with baseline. <h4><b>Conclusions</b></h4><p dir="ltr">Use of sit–stand desks is acceptable within general practice and may reduce sitting time in GPs. This may benefit GPs and help reduce sitting time in patients. <p dir="ltr"><b>Trial registration number: </b>ISRCTN76982860.

Figshare
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Feasibility and acceptability of general practitioners using sit–stand desks: a feasibility trial · Figshare (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS