Apparent diffusion coefficient for genetic characterisation of untreated adult gliomas: a meta-analysis stratified by methods

Background: Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation and chromosome 1p19q genotyping have become fundamental to the prognostic grouping of adult diffuse gliomas. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values may enable non-invasive prediction of glioma molecular status. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of ADC for IDH and 1p19q genotyping, considering measurement techniques and tumour grade. // Methods: A systematic search of PubMed and Cochrane Library databases was performed in December 2024. Studies were grouped according to the ADC parameter measured and the measurement techniques used. A meta-analysis was performed, supplemented by Egger’s regression testing. The quality of studies was assessed with the QUADAS-2 tool. // Results: Thirty-three studies including a total of 4297 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. IDH mutation and 1p19q deletion status were assessed by 30 and 14 studies respectively. Pooled area under the curve (AUC) values for the prediction of an IDH mutation and 1p19q codeletion ranged from 0.743 (0.680-0.805) to 0.804 (0.689-0.919), and 0.678 (0.614-0.741) to 0.692 (0.600-0.783). No significant differences were identified between regional and volumetric measurements, between ADCmean and ADCmin values, or comparing normalised and raw ADC data. // Conclusion: This meta-analysis supports ADC as an imaging biomarker in untreated gliomas, specifically to predict IDH status. ROI measurement, particularly by a single ADCmean, is rapid, reproducible and appears statistically equivalent to volumetric read outs. We found no evidence for superior diagnostic accuracy by ADC normalisation. Published ADC thresholds have been summarised for consideration of prospective testing across institutions.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
UCL Discovery (University College London)
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Data Analysis with R
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Apparent diffusion coefficient for genetic characterisation of untreated adult gliomas: a meta-analysis stratified by methods

UCL Discovery (University College London)
Data Analysis with R
article

Apparent diffusion coefficient for genetic characterisation of untreated adult gliomas: a meta-analysis stratified by methods

article en

Abstract

Background: Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation and chromosome 1p19q genotyping have become fundamental to the prognostic grouping of adult diffuse gliomas. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values may enable non-invasive prediction of glioma molecular status. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of ADC for IDH and 1p19q genotyping, considering measurement techniques and tumour grade. // Methods: A systematic search of PubMed and Cochrane Library databases was performed in December 2024. Studies were grouped according to the ADC parameter measured and the measurement techniques used. A meta-analysis was performed, supplemented by Egger’s regression testing. The quality of studies was assessed with the QUADAS-2 tool. // Results: Thirty-three studies including a total of 4297 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. IDH mutation and 1p19q deletion status were assessed by 30 and 14 studies respectively. Pooled area under the curve (AUC) values for the prediction of an IDH mutation and 1p19q codeletion ranged from 0.743 (0.680-0.805) to 0.804 (0.689-0.919), and 0.678 (0.614-0.741) to 0.692 (0.600-0.783). No significant differences were identified between regional and volumetric measurements, between ADCmean and ADCmin values, or comparing normalised and raw ADC data. // Conclusion: This meta-analysis supports ADC as an imaging biomarker in untreated gliomas, specifically to predict IDH status. ROI measurement, particularly by a single ADCmean, is rapid, reproducible and appears statistically equivalent to volumetric read outs. We found no evidence for superior diagnostic accuracy by ADC normalisation. Published ADC thresholds have been summarised for consideration of prospective testing across institutions.

UCL Discovery (University College London)
University of Nottingham (GB), Precision for Medicine (United States) (US), Queen's Medical Centre (GB)
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, National Institute for Health and Care Research, University College London, University of Nottingham, Technische Universität München, Brain Tumour Research, NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Data Analysis with R
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.